Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WADA: USADA Is The Body Which Would Be The One To Use

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by sweetscience18 View Post
    If fighters get caught, which is more likely with random testing, the commission probably would still pick up the fine. Im sure the commission doesnt find any problems with random ost.
    you may have a point there......

    but there are still a lot of issues to be cleared, such as the territorial jurisdiction of the accredited test agencies....

    on top of the others, other concerns are:

    is the application of this kind of testing on a per fighter's request basis only?

    will it not be then like an elective process?....for only those who want it?

    will fights won using this test make any difference with fights won using the regular testing of the commissions?

    people are for the best testing there is, including me..for the fighter's health

    but i still read articles on experts not even having a unanimous verdict which testing is the best to use...sad

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by sweetscience18 View Post
      When the agency youre asking for, is the same agency that you would already be using, it gets a little complicated.
      if you're telling me that may clan's attack dog an impartial agency then i don't know where you get your definition of impartial..

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by tangalog2200 View Post
        you may have a point there......

        but there are still a lot of issues to be cleared, such as the territorial jurisdiction of the accredited test agencies....

        on top of the others, other concerns are:

        is the application of this kind of testing on a per fighter's request basis only?

        will it not be then like an elective process?....for only those who want it?

        will fights won using this test make any difference with fights won using the regular testing of the commissions?

        people are for the best testing there is, including me..for the fighter's health

        but i still read articles on experts not even having a unanimous verdict which testing is the best to use...sad
        If you can afford it, and you want good testing, than use it.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by dldwizard View Post
          i think they're the same one's who took the sample when the random drug testing was ordered by nsac when this thing first blew up..
          So its biased for manny to use usada but not for him to use the agency approved by the congress that he sits in? Not saying that they arent officiak i dont know about them im just saying arums a crook.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by sweetscience18 View Post
            I actualky think that if this is a teal issue for manny and not one of arums excuses. They should let a foreign agency test pac while hes in the phillippines. Whatever agency that is though it would have to be credible.
            but if there is an accredited one in the Philippines, using a foreign test agency is like a slap in the face? will it not amount to double standard?

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by tangalog2200 View Post
              but if there is an accredited one in the Philippines, using a foreign test agency is like a slap in the face? will it not amount to double standard?
              This is why its a roadblock.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by tangalog2200 View Post
                you may have a point there......

                but there are still a lot of issues to be cleared, such as the territorial jurisdiction of the accredited test agencies....

                on top of the others, other concerns are:

                is the application of this kind of testing on a per fighter's request basis only?

                will it not be then like an elective process?....for only those who want it?

                will fights won using this test make any difference with fights won using the regular testing of the commissions?

                people are for the best testing there is, including me..for the fighter's health

                but i still read articles on experts not even having a unanimous verdict which testing is the best to use...sad
                i think it's been during the first negotation blow up that this new non-invasive drug testing procedure that uses hair have been first mentioned..

                Comment


                • #98
                  I see what Floyd means when he says it's impossible to negotiate with Bob.

                  I can see bob coming up with some bull**** night in night out

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by tangalog2200 View Post
                    but if there is an accredited one in the Philippines, using a foreign test agency is like a slap in the face? will it not amount to double standard?
                    why should it be? the fight is happening in the us, pac is gonna be training in the us. why would the psc have jurisdiction here? if the fight happens in the phillipines then there would be a decent argument.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by sweetscience18 View Post
                      So its biased for manny to use usada but not for him to use the agency approved by the congress that he sits in? Not saying that they arent officiak i dont know about them im just saying arums a crook.
                      they only took the sample.. nsac's the one who did the testing themselves.. nsac the one who announce the result of the testing.. so what the heck are you talking about? and another thing.. pacquiao's not even a congresman then..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP