Conspiracy: One Of The Williams-Lara Judges Violated The Ali Act

[uoykcuf]

We should keep bumping this topic, someone should get into contact with Lara's promoter. Someones in deep **** if this is true.

[DoktorSleepless]

Can someone please explain what conflict on interest there is? There was USBO or IBO title or title eliminator on the line, so why does it matter? And even if there was, I don't see the big deal as long it's disclosed.

I skimmed through the act and as far as I can tell it doesn't say anything about sanctioning organization members not being allowed to judge.
http://www.ftc.gov/os/mabra/aliact.pdf

[crillz]

http://8countnews.com/news/125/ARTIC...011-07-10.html

**** is crazy yo, I lost 25$ in that fight I had 25$ on Lara to win 75$ plus my 25$ back

[el malo]

Can someone please explain what conflict on interest there is? There was USBO or IBO title or title eliminator on the line, so why does it matter? And even if there was, I don't see the big deal as long it's disclosed.

I skimmed through the act and as far as I can tell it doesn't say anything about sanctioning organization members not being allowed to judge.
http://www.ftc.gov/os/mabra/aliact.pdf

No member or employee of a boxing commission, no person who administers or enforces State boxing laws, and no member of the Association of Boxing Commissions may belong to, contract with, or receive any compensation from, any person who sanctions, arranges, or promotes professional boxing matches or who otherwise has a financial interest in an active boxer currently registered with a boxer registry. For purposes of this section, the term “compensation” does not include funds held in escrow for payment to another person in connection with a professional boxing match. The prohibition set forth in this section shall not apply to any contract entered into, or any reasonable compensation received, by a boxing commission to supervise a professional boxing match in another State as described in section 6303 of this title

http://8countnews.com/news/125/ARTIC...011-07-10.html

[uoykcuf]

Lame, it was his son that judged it not his father. No ones in trouble...

boxrec listed it wrong it was Whitaker II not the III who scored the fight.

[Hitman932]

Can someone please explain what conflict on interest there is? There was USBO or IBO title or title eliminator on the line, so why does it matter? And even if there was, I don't see the big deal as long it's disclosed.

Whether or not the title is on the line those organizations are ranking the fighters based on their performances in the ring.

Just because this Hilton fella isn't well known, and the IBO or USBO aren't major titles, it's really no different than if Jose Sulaiman sat down and judged a fight between two fighters ranked say #15 and #13 by the WBC.

[Hitman932]

Lame, it was his son that judged it not his father. No ones in trouble...

boxrec listed it wrong it was Whitaker II not the III who scored the fight.

Even so, his family association with ranking officials and the terrible decision rendered should raise plenty of questions about why Armstrong II was nominated as a judge and who was behind it.

[uoykcuf]

His dad was probably behind it to get his son a job, so his sons not a complete bum. He probably was bribed too, but who knows where anyone can get the evidence to support that. All we know now is that he is just a very ****ty judge.