who cares what Lederman had? and equal amount of people or more had it for JMM
yea and moving on the outside and Counter punching is called Boxing....
something apparently you know very little about
man, my scores with pac jmm in both fights were very similar to ledermans....yeah it's still called boxing , but clinching is still clinching and runing is stil running.....i never said lara was'nt boxing....
Originally posted by welcometosaigon
I always thought about putting you on my ignore list, but this just made it official. I'm glad I won't be reading your garbage anymore.
like i care....i dont go to your ****ty threads anyways....
I'm very happy that Williams won but Lara clearly took the fight
How can you be happy Williams got the decision if Lara "clearly took the fight"? You're happy Lara got robbed and Goosen-Tutor/Al Haymon completely undermined any remaining credibility in the sport of boxing?
I'm very happy that Williams won but Lara clearly took the fight
How can you be happy about this? Don't you like/love boxing? This is the type of **** that is destroying it! And yes I'm more of a fan of Williams than Lara, but fair is fair.
man, my scores with pac jmm in both fights were very similar to ledermans....yeah it's still called boxing , but clinching is still clinching and runing is stil running.....i never said lara was'nt boxing....
like i care....i dont go to your ****ty threads anyways....
I actually understand what Puga is saying here and somewhat agree with it. The way Williams stayed active in the clinch while Lara did nothing can steal rounds with as often as they were tied up. I still would put it 115-113 Lara even if I gave PWill the most generous scoring I could, but fighting in and from the clinch is still a pretty important part of observing a match.
I in no way agree with the JMM-Pacroid analogy though.
Comment