USADA cannot be considered neutral

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tatangb45
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2011
    • 1161
    • 32
    • 0
    • 7,254

    #11
    Originally posted by DempseyRollin
    usada is not a us judge and what ur saying does not at all make sense in this case. usada is not a meidator. they are in the business of anti doping. what the hell would they get by "siding" with floyd on this? a bad reputation. a bad reputation, something that would hurt their business. u guys are making analogies that just dont make common sense.
    How can the USADA be considered unbiased if it was chosen and paid for by Floyd? They are performing the role of an investigator hired by the accuser. There are many ways to favor one party over the other. Just because USADA is a government created agency does not guarantee that it is beyond being influenced.

    Comment

    • straightleft
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2010
      • 3557
      • 162
      • 0
      • 9,979

      #12
      Originally posted by DempseyRollin
      usada is not a us judge and what ur saying does not at all make sense in this case. usada is not a meidator. they are in the business of anti doping. what the hell would they get by "siding" with floyd on this? a bad reputation. a bad reputation, something that would hurt their business. u guys are making analogies that just dont make common sense.
      You want the fight or you just want to keep arguing on PEDs forever? Pac already kneeling on Floyd knees just to make this happen because Pac said the fans want it otherwise he doesn't need the coward. What? you want him to lick Floyd balls as well? You *****nks are bunches of whining b!tches.
      Last edited by straightleft; 07-09-2011, 09:01 PM.

      Comment

      • Carpe Diem
        Seize the day
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 16019
        • 1,232
        • 995
        • 44,413

        #13
        Originally posted by CONQUERING
        Look at Arum. That dude is genius. Spews some non-sense and the gullible fans of his cash cow eat it up.
        USADA is a racial black owned anti-doping testing agency which happen to rig its athletes of other race test results, so it can't be trusted. Therefore, it's best if WADA insist for China Anti-Doping Agency (CHINADA) to handle it all with the assistance of NSAC just to make it more fair.
        Last edited by Carpe Diem; 07-09-2011, 09:04 PM.

        Comment

        • straightleft
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 3557
          • 162
          • 0
          • 9,979

          #14
          Originally posted by Boxing Tiger
          USADA is a racial black owned anti-doping testing agency which happen to rig its athletes of other race test results, so it can't be trusted. Therefore, it's best if WADA insist for China Anti-Doping Agency (CHINADA) to handle it all with the assistance of NSAC just to make it more fair.
          You want the fight or you just want to keep arguing on PEDs forever? Pac already accepted Floyd OST in Floyd's favor. Why you keep whining about this minor changes when you get with the same result you all *****nks wanted badly. Pac already kneeling on Floyd knees just to make this happen because Pac said the fans want it otherwise he doesn't need the coward. What? you want him to lick Floyd balls as well? You *****nks are bunches of whining b!tches.
          Last edited by straightleft; 07-09-2011, 09:16 PM.

          Comment

          • LupinIII
            Interim Champion
            • Jul 2010
            • 880
            • 41
            • 0
            • 7,036

            #15
            Originally posted by tatangb45
            How can the USADA be considered unbiased if it was chosen and paid for by Floyd? They are performing the role of an investigator hired by the accuser. There are many ways to favor one party over the other. Just because USADA is a government created agency does not guarantee that it is beyond being influenced.
            which neutral agency brah?

            Comment

            • tatangb45
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2011
              • 1161
              • 32
              • 0
              • 7,254

              #16
              Originally posted by LupinIII
              im fine with it but which neutral agency brah?
              WADA is one and they can assign which laboratory will conduct the testing, or they can even give it to USADA but under their supervision. They can also impose the IOC drug testing rule which states that they can take blood and urine samples, both during, or in-competition, as well as out-of-competition which can occur at anytime, at any location, without any advance notice.

              Comment

              • Manny#1ATG
                Banned
                • May 2011
                • 462
                • 53
                • 5
                • 556

                #17
                If they can find a neutral party to agree upon, lets go!

                I have been following these threads, but I need a few questions answered before I hop aboard the "USADA is a puppet organization directed by Floyd to make Pacquiao test dirty" train.

                Who would pay for the testing in the fight with whatever neutral agency they might select?

                How would that make a different agency any less "neutral" if the parties involved are still paying them?

                Comment

                • Carpe Diem
                  Seize the day
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 16019
                  • 1,232
                  • 995
                  • 44,413

                  #18
                  Originally posted by straightleft
                  You want the fight or you just want to keep arguing on PEDs forever? Pac already accepted Floyd OST in Floyd's favor. Why you keep whining about this minor changes when you get with the result you all *****nks wanted badly. Pac already kneeling on Floyd knees just to make this happen because Pac said the fans want it otherwise he doesn't need the coward. What? you want him to lick Floyd balls as well? You *****nks are bunches of whining b!tches.
                  I don't have any problem with it as long both sides agrees which Floyd already has. What pisses me off is how some of y'all *******s are trying to portraying USADA as some sort of a corrupt anti-doping agency when none of y'all had any negative complaints to said about it before Arum spoke up.
                  Last edited by Carpe Diem; 07-09-2011, 09:27 PM.

                  Comment

                  • iPhoneKiller
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2011
                    • 1614
                    • 70
                    • 15
                    • 2,188

                    #19
                    GBP and Top Rank should pay. It's the biggest boxing fight ever! 50 mil each is huge! They can afford it...

                    Using a German Olympic approved facility is fine with me. Neutral country and advance.

                    Comment

                    • tatangb45
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jun 2011
                      • 1161
                      • 32
                      • 0
                      • 7,254

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Manny#1ATG
                      If they can find a neutral party to agree upon, lets go!

                      I have been following these threads, but I need a few questions answered before I hop aboard the "USADA is a puppet organization directed by Floyd to make Pacquiao test dirty" train.

                      Who would pay for the testing in the fight with whatever neutral agency they might select?

                      How would that make a different agency any less "neutral" if the parties involved are still paying them?
                      Who would pay? That's easy. Simply deduct the cost from the total price money. Problem solved.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP