When there is a disagreement between two parties regarding an accusation by one of the parties, the chosen mediator must be neutral. When the mediator is chosen and paid for by the party that made the accusation, that mediator ceases to be neutral. Whether or not that mediator intends to remain neutral does not change the fact that he is now perceived as being indebted to his benefactor. Under these circumstances, any mediator with integrity has no other recourse but to recuse himself from that responsibility. Even a U.S. judge cannot preside over a case where he has had previous dealings, especially business dealings, with one of the parties involved in a dispute.
USADA cannot be considered neutral
Collapse
-
usada is not a us judge and what ur saying does not at all make sense in this case. usada is not a meidator. they are in the business of anti doping. what the hell would they get by "siding" with floyd on this? a bad reputation. a bad reputation, something that would hurt their business. u guys are making analogies that just dont make common sense.When there is a disagreement between two parties regarding an accusation by one of the parties, the chosen mediator must be neutral. When the mediator is chosen and paid for by the party that made the accusation, that mediator ceases to be neutral. Whether or not that mediator intends to remain neutral does not change the fact that he is now perceived as being indebted to his benefactor. Under these circumstances, any mediator with integrity has no other recourse but to recuse himself from that responsibility. Even a U.S. judge cannot preside over a case where he has had previous dealings, especially business dealings, with one of the parties involved in a dispute. -
Comment
-
***ing *******s.......if you dont want to trust the most trusted WADA agency in the ****ing world then look here an choose:When there is a disagreement between two parties regarding an accusation by one of the parties, the chosen mediator must be neutral. When the mediator is chosen and paid for by the party that made the accusation, that mediator ceases to be neutral. Whether or not that mediator intends to remain neutral does not change the fact that he is now perceived as being indebted to his benefactor. Under these circumstances, any mediator with integrity has no other recourse but to recuse himself from that responsibility. Even a U.S. judge cannot preside over a case where he has had previous dealings, especially business dealings, with one of the parties involved in a dispute.
Country NADO
Cameroun Organisation Camerounaise de Lutte contre le Dopage en Sport (OCALUDS)
Canada Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES)
China China Anti-Doping Agency (CHINADA)
Czech Republic Anti-Doping Committee of the Czech Republic
Philippines Philippines Sports Commission LOL
Germany Nationale Anti Doping Agentur (NADA)Comment
Comment