The thing was Eubank had very good skills combined with personality, that's what made him special, you can't compare him to a side show like butterbean.
chris eubank only gets recognized in two areas: in the UK and on this web site.
he doesnt get recognized anywhere else. walk up to ANYBODY in the world and ask "do you know who chris eubank is?"
i promise you this: 99.9% of the people you talk to wont have a damn clue who chris eubank is. people dont know him because chris eubank isnt worth remembering.
Originally posted by TheEvilSaint
just because ur well known doesnt mean ur any good i.e. mike tyson since 2000, evander holyfield since the 1st ruiz fight, george foreman after the moorer fight, sugar ray leonard (his whole career), roy jones, and others.
ur fanbase is no reflection on your skill.
Sorry, I'm totally confused with this... you slag off Chris for not being well known (in America)... then you say even if he was well known that doesn't mean he was any good?
Sorry, I'm totally confused with this... you slag off Chris for not being well known (in America)... then you say even if he was well known that doesn't mean he was any good?
What the ****????? Where's the logic in that?
just because ur well known, doesnt mean ur any good, true. sugar ray leonard ****** and yet the whole world new him. you could get hyped up like crazy like gerry cooney and still suck.
just because ur well known, doesnt mean ur any good, true. sugar ray leonard ****** and yet the whole world new him. you could get hyped up like crazy like gerry cooney and still suck.
its not that hard to figure out, r-tard.
No... YOU'RE the ******, boy.
You made TWO SEPARATE STATEMENTS.
The point you were making in ONE contradicted the point you were making in the SECOND. Capish?
The point you were making in ONE contradicted the point you were making in the SECOND. Capish?
pot calling the kettle black.
in my first statement, if you ever read it, i said: except for the UK and this web site, nobody knows who chris eubank is.
in my second statement, if you ever read it, i said: just because people know you, doesnt mean ur any good.
if you want me to sum it up for someone as simple and ****** as you, hows this: nobody except the UK knows eubank, and just because the UK knows him, doesnt mean hes any good.
in my first statement, if you ever read it, i said: except for the UK and this web site, nobody knows who chris eubank is.
in my second statement, if you ever read it, i said: just because people know you, doesnt mean ur any good.
if you want me to sum it up for someone as simple and ****** as you, hows this: nobody except the UK knows eubank, and just because the UK knows him, doesnt mean hes any good.
Oh Jesus Christ. Is it just me or is this guy talking ****. Look, call me all the "low intelligence" epithets you want, it doesn't bother me. Particularly when it's obvious how thick you are.
So Chris is crap because he's not well known... but he's also well known that doesn't make him good?
Oh Jesus Christ. Is it just me or is this guy talking ****. Look, call me all the "low intelligence" epithets you want, it doesn't bother me. Particularly when it's obvious how thick you are.
So Chris is crap because he's not well known... but he's also well known that doesn't make him good?
instead of trying desperatly to insult me, and failing miserably, why dont you try and prove me wrong?
your reading only parts of what i said and switching it around to make it seem like im contradicting myself when i made it clear what i meant. i made it so clear, that im actually suprised that you didnt understand it.
chris eubank is overhyped, overrated, and unmemorable.
if you want me to make it any easier for you to understand, ur a ****ing imbecile.
Comment