Comments Thread For: Roach: If Mayweather Beats Ortiz, Pacquiao is Waiting

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • richardt
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2007
    • 22102
    • 2,623
    • 204
    • 77,067

    #161
    If May beats Ortiz and Pac loses to Marquez, no one is going to want to see May vs Marquez. But if Pac beats Marquez and May loses, Pac vs Ortiz would be a great fight. If the underdogs win, Ortiz vs Marquez would be interesting. The only bad scenario is where May and Marquez win because May already dominated Marquez.

    Comment

    • GRUSTLER
      Undisputed champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2008
      • 14118
      • 444
      • 115
      • 20,934

      #162
      Originally posted by richardt
      Grustler -you should know better......excuses are only lame IF the fighter making the excuses does not win the rematch and Pac knocked out Morales twice.
      OK, so what do you call what he was doing on the video? Pac lost the first fight and that's when he made his excuses. Right or wrong?

      Comment

      • richardt
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2007
        • 22102
        • 2,623
        • 204
        • 77,067

        #163
        I don't think either Pac or May or anyone from their sides are just using publicity.....it clearly looks like both sides want the fight. My pick is May 116 to 114 and close only because Pac rocks May a couple times and drops him but May dominates the rest of the fight with precision counters.

        Comment

        • richardt
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2007
          • 22102
          • 2,623
          • 204
          • 77,067

          #164
          Originally posted by GRUSTLER
          OK, so what do you call what he was doing on the video? Pac lost the first fight and that's when he made his excuses. Right or wrong?
          If he had lost the rematch, then all he had was excuses, if he won, then he had reasons. Plain and simple.

          Comment

          • richardt
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2007
            • 22102
            • 2,623
            • 204
            • 77,067

            #165
            I'll make it easy. If a runner runs a mile in 2 minutes and says he could have done it in less than 2 minutes but his knee hurt and then he does the race again with a good knee and still does it in 2 minutes, he had excuses. If instead he comes back and wins in 1 minute and 45 seconds, then he had a reason.

            Comment

            • richardt
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2007
              • 22102
              • 2,623
              • 204
              • 77,067

              #166
              The difference between reasons and excuses boils down to what happens when they try again at something and the outcome.

              Comment

              • richardt
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2007
                • 22102
                • 2,623
                • 204
                • 77,067

                #167
                Example: Terry Norris, when knocked out by Simon Brown said that he was just not himself in that fight. If he had lost the rematch too, it would have been seen as EXCUSES. Since he DOMINATED in picture-perfect fashion in the rematch, it showed he had REASONS why he lost the first fight.
                Last edited by richardt; 07-06-2011, 11:57 AM.

                Comment

                • Chups
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 18400
                  • 1,835
                  • 1,281
                  • 52,879

                  #168
                  [IMG]http://i262.***********.com/albums/ii97/panorama_lofts/PacLand/manny-pacquiao.jpg[/IMG]
                  [IMG]http://i262.***********.com/albums/ii97/panorama_lofts/PacLand/mayweathers.jpg[/IMG]

                  Comment

                  • Ratchet21
                    Amateur
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 8
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    • 6,018

                    #169
                    Nope, I think its raw natural talent good training, good nutrition, good faith, and a heart of a warrior, and after PAC takes those dumb-ass tests and whoops on floyd all you haters will be eating crow..

                    Comment

                    • tomhawq
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 4191
                      • 586
                      • 183
                      • 8,620

                      #170
                      Originally posted by Ratchet21
                      Nope, I think its raw natural talent good training, good nutrition, good faith, and a heart of a warrior, and after PAC takes those dumb-ass tests and whoops on floyd all you haters will be eating crow..
                      floyd at this point don't have balls to enter a pac negotiation let alone fight pac in the ring. he's happy saying "take the test pac!", "you're next pac!"

                      all talk, no balls.

                      fight will never happen.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP