Roach: We want the Floyd fight 'badly'

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dedication
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2011
    • 1668
    • 113
    • 17
    • 2,375

    #31
    BS from Roach. Here's some more evident info for you to take in from Ben Thompson of Fight Hype.http://fighthype.com/pages/content10239.html

    My question is simple. I wanted to know why you think the test is still a big issue given the fact the pacman himself stated that he would agree to all terms given by money? Also do you think the fight between money and pacman compares to Ali/Foreman or Ali/Fraser? Thanks SGT B

    BT: The tests are still a big issue because, thus far, Team Mayweather has not been presented an offer which states, on paper, that Pacquiao has agreed to take the random blood and urine tests that they require. I think what's getting lost in translation here is that regardless of what people think Manny himself has stated, his promoter, Bob Arum, has yet to come to the table with an offer, on paper, stating that Pacquiao will agree to the testing. Arum has done a masterful job of making it appear as though he's doing everything in his power to make the fight between Mayweather and Pacquiao. So long as fans continue to believe that he's trying to make the fight, then it's okay for him to put Manny in with Joshua Clottey, Antonio Margarito, Shane Mosley and now Juan Mauel Marquez again, all the while keeping the majority of the profit from those fight as opposed to the cut he would get from the Mayweather fight. Don't get me wrong, he'd make A LOT of money from Mayweather vs. Pacquiao, HOWEVER, is it going to be more than what he's been pocketing from some of these past events? Opponents like Clottey, Margarito and even Mosley came at a cheap price in the grand scheme of things. That means less money out of Arum's pocket, and you can bet that he's perfectly content with that, especially if it means that he doesn't have to see a big chunk of the money going to Mayweather. At the end of the day, Bob Arum is in the business of making money, so if he felt that Mayweather vs. Pacquiao would make him that much more money than what he's currently making, believe me, he would have bent over backwards trying to convince Manny to take the tests and get the deal done. I mean, it's not exactly like he exhausted all efforts to make the fight a reality. Keep in mind, back in December of 2009, Arum was quick to try and walk away from negotiations and called the fight off on more than one occassion. Even after that, he seemed content with just passing notes to Ross Greenburg in attempt to "negotiate" with the other side. Those aren't exactly the actions of someone who's doing everything in his power to make the fight happen. It's what I like to call the art of non-negotiation. As for the fight itself comparing to Ali/Foreman or Ali/Frazier, no comparison to Ali/Frazier at all, but it's bigger than Ali/Foreman in my opinion. After all, if I remember correctly, going into the fight, Foreman was expected to smash Ali.

    Hi Ben, I enjoy reading your articles. Keep up the good work. And have you seen this video (Pacquiao agrees to fully random blood testing)? What's your take on it? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5ns-kQqYrI -Jose


    BT: Thanks for the kudos, Jose. Yeah, I've seen the infamous "Manny Pacquiao Agress to random Blood Test and Wants Floyd" video. Here's the thing though, in that video, I didn't hear Manny say that he'll agree to random blood tests leading all the way up until the fight. What I heard him say was, "We agree all his, you know, demands." The question is, which demands is he agreeing to? Is he agreeing to his current request of random drug testing leading all the way up until the bout? Or is he agreeing to Mayweather's original offer of a 14-day cut-off when the two sides entered into mediation in early 2010? The guy asking the questions was trying to lead him a bit by specifying that he did not require a cut-off date, which prompted Manny to simply agree and say, "Yes," but that still isn't a definitive answer in my opinion, especially considering how quickly the question was brushed off. Furthermore, that video was recorded in the weeks prior to his fight with Antonio Margarito. The funny thing is, there's another video that came out in the weeks prior to his fight with Margarito, except this one aired on HBO. In the first episode of HBO's 24/7 Pacquiao Margarito, while commenting on the mysterious second round of negotiations, Pacquiao's own advisor, Michael Koncz, states, "We pretty much agreed to anything on the drug testing except not within 7 days." Take a look at this link, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXBIh_NDPss, and let me know what you think. To me, it looks like Team Pacquiao is having a hard time keeping their stories straight. The bottom line, however, is that thus far, Team Mayweather has not been presented an offer which states, on paper, that Pacquiao has agreed to take the random blood and urine tests that they require, so it really doesn't matter what he may or may not say.

    Comment

    • deejd
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 3376
      • 88
      • 353
      • 10,029

      #32
      Originally posted by Alibata
      “Last time, we agreed to everything he asked. On my side and on Manny’s side, we want that fight a hundred percent,” Roach said.

      Comment

      • deejd
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 3376
        • 88
        • 353
        • 10,029

        #33
        Originally posted by Dedication
        More BS from Team Pac.

        If you wanted to fight Mayweather badly

        1. Why didn't you agree to the offer presented on the table during the first round of negotiotions?

        2. Why haven't you sent him a new contract?

        Ok then. STFU Roach.
        If anything, Roach is probably getting Mayweather mixed up with Mike Jones.

        Comment

        • skillswin
          Undisputed Champion
          • May 2011
          • 1968
          • 63
          • 6
          • 8,120

          #34

          Comment

          • Dedication
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2011
            • 1668
            • 113
            • 17
            • 2,375

            #35
            Originally posted by skillswin
            Rofl, team Pac trying desperately to save face.

            Comment

            • DoktorSleepless
              DoktorWakeless
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Aug 2010
              • 11473
              • 440
              • 186
              • 27,349

              #36
              Originally posted by Freddie Roach
              Last time, we agreed to everything he asked. On my side and on Manny’s side, we want that fight a hundred percent,” Roach said.
              Notice that in these vague statements from Team Pacquiao about agreeing to all of Floyd's demands, the cutoff date is never mentioned. It's true they agreed to all the terms, but only the terms from original proposoal with a 14 day cutoff date. The contract had a specific time limit and it stopped valid on a specific date. So technically, they did not agree to all Floyd's terms because team Pacquiao did not agree to the time limit. After that, that contract was no longer valid and Floyd has requested no cutoff date since then, which Pacquiao definitely has not agreed to. So team Pacquiao is trying to be sneaky when they say they agree to all his terms because it's only a half-truth.
              Last edited by DoktorSleepless; 07-04-2011, 04:38 PM.

              Comment

              • Dedication
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2011
                • 1668
                • 113
                • 17
                • 2,375

                #37
                Originally posted by DoktorSleepless
                Notice that in these vague statements from Team Pacquiao about agreeing to all of Floyd's demands, the cutoff date is never mentioned. It's true they agreed to all the terms, but only the terms from original proposoal with a 14 day cutoff date. The contract had a specific time limit and it stopped valid on a specific date. So technically, they did not agree to all Floyd's terms because team Pacquiao did not agree to the time limit. After that, that contract was no longer valid and Floyd has requested no cutoff date since then, which Pacquiao definitely has not agreed to. So team Pacquiao is trying to be sneaky when they say they agree to all his terms because it's only a half-truth.
                I second, third and fourth this.

                Comment

                • Brail
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • May 2009
                  • 108
                  • 3
                  • 0
                  • 6,137

                  #38
                  Don't confuse agreed to demands (with cut-offs), with agreeing to full OST.

                  And don't put to much stock into a guy that says "test, no problem!" only for it to become a problem before his fighter signs a contract.

                  Will team Pac ever sign a contract for full OST? -- If Floyd and Pac get past there next opponents, then all attention will be on this question...

                  And Team Pac better have the correct answer.

                  Comment

                  • hugh grant
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 30525
                    • 2,195
                    • 918
                    • 105,596

                    #39
                    Whats the lesser of the two evils floyd, Pac or Sergio? If you dont want Pac in your next fight, do you really want Sergio?

                    Both are southpaws, which one is it.

                    Comment

                    • Brail
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • May 2009
                      • 108
                      • 3
                      • 0
                      • 6,137

                      #40
                      Originally posted by DoktorSleepless
                      Notice that in these vague statements from Team Pacquiao about agreeing to all of Floyd's demands, the cutoff date is never mentioned. It's true they agreed to all the terms, but only the terms from original proposoal with a 14 day cutoff date. The contract had a specific time limit and it stopped valid on a specific date. So technically, they did not agree to all Floyd's terms because team Pacquiao did not agree to the time limit. After that, that contract was no longer valid and Floyd has requested no cutoff date since then, which Pacquiao definitely has not agreed to. So team Pacquiao is trying to be sneaky when they say they agree to all his terms because it's only a half-truth.
                      Truth.

                      Glad some can see through the top rank talking points.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP