Does David Haye take the UK fans for ******?

[VERILY]

[The Hammer]

Good stuff!

[Money_May]

So when it comes to mayweather, bradley, the klitschkos (and the many many MANY bums they have fought between them) people call it good business sense? BUT when it comes to haye and one fight with Fraudley they say he's conning the fans. DONT MAKE ME ****ING LAUGH WITH YOUR HYPOCRISY

[Weebler I]

Haye never wanted to fight Harrison, but Sky kept waving money in his face.

Haye told the British public before the fight it was going to be a wipe-out and an uncompetitive fight.

The ones who bought the fight clearly listened to Audley, not Haye.




Disappointing to see the blind hate for the UK and UK boxing fans in this thread, who are surely the best fans in the world.

[The Hammer]

So when it comes to mayweather, bradley, the klitschkos (and the many many MANY bums they have fought between them) people call it good business sense? BUT when it comes to haye and one fight with Fraudley they say he's conning the fans. DONT MAKE ME ****ING LAUGH WITH YOUR HYPOCRISY

All of Wlad's opponents since 2005 have been better and younger than age 39 Audley Harrison.

Audley has never had a win over a top 25 heavyweight. He lost to the gatekeeper Dominick Guinn, who was easily beaten by Chambers.

Most of Wlad's opponents during the last few years had never even been knocked down before or stopped before (Thompson, Chagaev, Chambers, Brock).

[Money_May]

All of Wlad's opponents since 2005 have been better and younger than age 39 Audley Harrison.

Audley has never had a win over a top 25 heavyweight. He lost to the gatekeeper Dominick Guinn, who was easily beaten by Chambers.

Most of Wlad's opponents during the last few years had never even been knocked down before or stopped before (Thompson, Chagaev, Chambers, Brock).

LOL yeah samuel peter and hasim rahman (only a year younger then fraudley) are 2 of his last 4 opponents, plz dont try and defend them 2! The only 2 fights i give wlad credit for recently were chagaev and ibragimov. Fair enough its not totally wlad's fault that the HW division has been terrible, but you cant have a go at Haye for fighting harrison either when the Klits have been doing exactly the same only for longer.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

So when it comes to mayweather, bradley, the klitschkos (and the many many MANY bums they have fought between them) people call it good business sense? BUT when it comes to haye and one fight with Fraudley they say he's conning the fans. DONT MAKE ME ****ING LAUGH WITH YOUR HYPOCRISY

Audley is infinitely worse than any opponent they have faced......combined.

[James78]

No everyone has the freedom (no pun intended lol) to make their own decisions. If anything it was Audley's confidence which mis-lead the public and made the fight seem like it would be close Haye said all along what would happen, and I knew all along what would happen and can understand the rationale behind Haye taking the fight.

It was a good business decision, and fair play to Haye for making as much money as he can out of the game. It was probably the first fight he has taken in his career thus far which really didn't serve much of a purpose apart from getting paid, you also have to take into consideration that Haye didn't pick Harrison out of a pot, he was European champ and a big name in England (whether that is justified or not is another argument) he would have probably got a shot against one of the Klits had Haye not fought him first.

Haye took a big risk going to France to fight Mormeck for very little money and brought home the titles. He took another big risk going to Germany to fight Valuev again with not a hugely favourable contract and luckily it did better than expected on ppv. The money he made from Harrison he can retire on, and now he is fighting the Champ of the world so whats your beef?

**** on the money bro. Good post.

[The Hammer]

LOL yeah samuel peter and hasim rahman (only a year younger then fraudley) are 2 of his last 4 opponents, plz dont try and defend them 2! The only 2 fights i give wlad credit for recently were chagaev and ibragimov. Fair enough its not totally wlad's fault that the HW division has been terrible, but you cant have a go at Haye for fighting harrison either when the Klits have been doing exactly the same only for longer.

Don't LIE.

Hasim Rahman was chosen by the IBF as mandatory because their mandatory Alexander Povetkin who was injured.

Hasim Rahman is a two-time world champion and had just turned 36 when he fought Wlad in late 2008.

Sam Peter is a former world champion and was chosen by the IBF as their mandatory after Alexander Povetkin b1tched out last year. Sam had just turned 30 when he fought Wlad last year.

Audley Harrison never had a world title, in fact he was beaten by gatekeepers like Dominick Guinn! Audley was age 39 when he fought Haye.

I'm not saying Peter and Rahman are or ever were great fighters. But they are both YOUNGER and have ACHIEVED MORE more in their professional careers than Audley.

[VERILY]

Haye puts bums in seats

Wlad puts bums in Heavyweight title fights

LMAO, and Haye, with his all-action run-run-lunge style would just be one more of those bums, right?


Wlad's heavyweight record >>>>>>>>>> Haye's, even just comparing their respective last 4 opponents only.


Wlad's a bigger star than Haye is. The Excusemaker had a chance to cement his stardom, but allowed it to pass him by, because he was too scared/too incapable of taking it to the 'robot'.


Run-run-lunge, run-run-lunge. Flop. Run-run-lunge.


Sheeeeeeeeeeesh, your Haye apologism is so whinily pathetic. GTFO, wuss.