Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Floyd has turned the tables on Manny in their chessmatch

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by yesir View Post
    I'm going to say it one more time since mental ******ation is your strong suit. Even with a win over Floyd, which would not happen, a win over bradley does NOT help put pac in the top 25

    Bradley does not pose any kind of threat to Floyd or Pacroid

    My test scores>>>>yours
    again, your reading comprehension sucks...wow.

    "with a win over floyd and a BRADLEY TYPE win, manny would be on everyone's top 25 ATG list..."

    that's what I wrote....

    b/c he would have a defeat of floyd, another great fighter close enough to his prime to matter and a young undefeated lion, and you're a fool/hater (like you are) not to have manny top 25 atg.

    dumbass. how are you gonna get a 1270 (above average SAT) and a 19 ACT. a 19 ACT is borderline ******, 17 is the bare minimum to get in a college. you're an exposed liar AGAIN. I got a 27 on my ACT's by the way and I only took it once as well.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by MARKBNLV View Post
      I was shocked when Floyd made this fight,he is 34 years old and is taking on a 24 year old who looked huge at WW and beat up a very good Berto,it makes me think that Pacquiao is ducking the tests,not to mention Manny never speaks for himself he is like a puppet for Arum and Roach,its ok to tow the company line at times but i believe Manny has taken it a bit to far.
      He fights Mosley who looked badly shot against a b level fighter in Mora,and is following it with a fight against Jmm years to late at a weight Jmm is clearly not effective at,but does that matter to the top rank crew hell no people are still paying to watch these crap fights against shells,at least Mayweather when he does fight goes after men coming off of huge wins.
      Couldn't have said it any better myself. Boxing fans see the truth. Pacquiao fans see what they want to see. Manny is Bob Arum's pawn. TRUTH.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Squizz View Post
        Couldn't have said it any better myself. Boxing fans see the truth. Pacquiao fans see what they want to see. Manny is Bob Arum's pawn. TRUTH.
        DLH was coming of a loss to Hopkins, retirement and tuneup fight against Mayorga
        Judah lose to a journeyman in Baldomir
        Brussels drew against a bum
        Corley lose to Judah
        Mitchell lose to Tzuyu, a tuneup win against a bum...

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Walt Liquor View Post
          again, your reading comprehension sucks...wow.

          "with a win over floyd and a BRADLEY TYPE win, manny would be on everyone's top 25 ATG list..."

          that's what I wrote....

          b/c he would have a defeat of floyd, another great fighter close enough to his prime to matter and a young undefeated lion, and you're a fool/hater (like you are) not to have manny top 25 atg.

          dumbass. how are you gonna get a 1270 (above average SAT) and a 19 ACT. a 19 ACT is borderline ******, 17 is the bare minimum to get in a college. you're an exposed liar AGAIN. I got a 27 on my ACT's by the way and I only took it once as well.
          For me, Pac is already in the top 25 ATG list. I think people who refuse that, refuse to see the mans accomplishments and are clouded by their hatred for him or their love for Mayweather.

          Pac started his career at 106lbs and is now a WW champ. He has 8 titles, if that's not top 25, IDK WTF is...

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Cuauhtémoc1502 View Post
            For me, Pac is already in the top 25 ATG list. I think people who refuse that, refuse to see the mans accomplishments and are clouded by their hatred for him or their love for Mayweather.

            Pac started his career at 106lbs and is now a WW champ. He has 8 titles, if that's not top 25, IDK WTF is...
            I think that's more than fair, if he beat floyd and someone like bradley, how could really be top 15. I left soke wiggle room for astute haters by sayijg top 25.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by yesir View Post
              I'm going to say it one more time since mental ******ation is your strong suit. Even with a win over Floyd, which would not happen, a win over bradley does NOT help put pac in the top 25

              Bradley does not pose any kind of threat to Floyd or Pacroid

              My test scores>>>>yours
              I like to refrain from the "top 20 atg" type of talk because it is solely opinion. But if Pac beat Floyd how could you ever say he is not one of the best 25 fighters of all time?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Danny Gunz View Post
                I like to refrain from the "top 20 atg" type of talk because it is solely opinion. But if Pac beat Floyd how could you ever say he is not one of the best 25 fighters of all time?
                Probably b/c he doesnt like to wack off to manny.... He's clearly ****sexual.

                Comment


                • Pac cannot beat floyd in my opinion

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by bearman3000 View Post
                    Pac cannot beat floyd in my opinion
                    Thats a big statememt, manny has the power to stun floyd amd he can finish. I csn underdtsnd you saying you heavily favor floyd, but to say Pac cant win it a little over the top.

                    Right now i consider it even money.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Cuauhtémoc1502 View Post
                      For me, Pac is already in the top 25 ATG list. I think people who refuse that, refuse to see the mans accomplishments and are clouded by their hatred for him or their love for Mayweather.

                      Pac started his career at 106lbs and is now a WW champ. He has 8 titles, if that's not top 25, IDK WTF is...
                      Your view seems to be clouded as well. To be critical of one fighter and not the other shows bias. You can be critical of Mayweather and be as equally critical of Pacquiao and be seen as fair and impartial.

                      We're talking quality of opponents. A lot of dynamics come into play when talking about a type of fighter; age, skill, talent, style, etc.

                      Mayweather can be seen as taking too long vacations, but I'd rather see him fight once a year, fighting TOP quality opposition as opposed to two subpar fights a year from Pacquiao.

                      You're praising Pacquiao for what he has done on paper, but this is boxing, if you haven't seen the fight, you don't know jack.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP