Lampley comments on PEDS

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CarlosG815
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 3683
    • 240
    • 192
    • 10,304

    #1

    Lampley comments on PEDS

    Do you agree with Jim Lampley?
  • ny123
    WBGC GOLD CHAMPION
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 8497
    • 236
    • 526
    • 15,369

    #2
    I thought you meant Lampley was on PEDS

    Comment

    • esconore
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 667
      • 44
      • 22
      • 6,899

      #3
      the interview looks like a Yakuza drug dealing...

      Comment

      • BattleAxePurist
        LayinTrapsSplittinSkulls
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2011
        • 5376
        • 90
        • 47
        • 11,853

        #4
        Originally posted by esconore
        the interview looks like a Yakuza drug dealing...
        really what was up with the all black backdrop
        he did make some interesting points

        Comment

        • AFighter4U
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2010
          • 3576
          • 63
          • 0
          • 9,768

          #5
          i disagree with jim lampey completely.

          true, people use drugs to enhance their performance all the time.

          BUT.

          when a boxer enhances his performance, it usually means that he'd be able to punch harder, take more punishment than usual and/or last longer.

          that usually means also that he'd inflict more damage to his opponent which may have some irrevocable and long-term results on the recipient.

          enhancements are ok under certain circumstances, but when it means inflicting more damage to another human being than normal, that's when i draw the line.

          Comment

          • STFU!!
            Interim Champion
            • Apr 2006
            • 617
            • 47
            • 0
            • 6,942

            #6
            I disagree, would make it impossible to compare fighters from different eras if the new aged used PEDs.

            Comment

            • The Evil 1-2
              Contender
              • Jul 2010
              • 456
              • 31
              • 0
              • 6,558

              #7
              Originally posted by AFighter4U
              i disagree with jim lampey completely.

              true, people use drugs to enhance their performance all the time.

              BUT.

              when a boxer enhances his performance, it usually means that he'd be able to punch harder, take more punishment than usual and/or last longer.

              that usually means also that he'd inflict more damage to his opponent which may have some irrevocable and long-term results on the recipient.

              enhancements are ok under certain circumstances, but when it means inflicting more damage to another human being than normal, that's when i draw the line.
              Well, your concern for the safety of fighters becomes a moot point if PEDs were legalized across the board. If every fighter was allowed to use them, then it would technically be a level playing field for all.

              I'm still on the fence about PED use. For one, I would like to continue the naivety about the natural meritocracy of all sports players, however times have changed. Even at that, Lampley did point out that enhancement boosters have been used throughout the history of sports.

              The issue, at hand, is whether PED use is dangerous for the athlete using it, not so much for the athlete that it is being used against. As highlighted in the documentary, "Bigger, Stronger, Faster," the AMA of the United States was actually defending the safety of steroids before Congress. In actuality, the path to making steroid/PED use in America illegal was more or less a campaign of morality, rather than medical safety.

              Comment

              • The Evil 1-2
                Contender
                • Jul 2010
                • 456
                • 31
                • 0
                • 6,558

                #8
                Originally posted by ShadowBoxing89
                I disagree, would make it impossible to compare fighters from different eras if the new aged used PEDs.
                I see your point. However, maybe it's best to look at fighters within the context of their own era.

                Comment

                • AFighter4U
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 3576
                  • 63
                  • 0
                  • 9,768

                  #9
                  Originally posted by The Evil 1-2
                  Well, your concern for the safety of fighters becomes a moot point if PEDs were legalized across the board. If every fighter was allowed to use them, then it would technically be a level playing field for all.

                  I'm still on the fence about PED use. For one, I would like to continue the naivety about the natural meritocracy of all sports players, however times have changed. Even at that, Lampley did point out that enhancement boosters have been used throughout the history of sports.

                  The issue, at hand, is whether PED use is dangerous for the athlete using it, not so much for the athlete that it is being used against. As highlighted in the documentary, "Bigger, Stronger, Faster," the AMA of the United States was actually defending the safety of steroids before Congress. In actuality, the path to making steroid/PED use in America illegal was more or less a campaign of morality, rather than medical safety.
                  that is a very good set of points there.

                  but IF PEDs would actually be legalized, i could see that the stars would eventually be the PEDS and no longer the fighters themselves.

                  Comment

                  • chiguy91
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 8865
                    • 1,239
                    • 1,515
                    • 17,428

                    #10
                    Originally posted by AFighter4U
                    that is a very good set of points there.

                    but IF PEDs would actually be legalized, i could see that the stars would eventually be the PEDS and no longer the fighters themselves.
                    yeah i must agree, records and wins would be tainted from it. i don't understand how someone could think it would be okay to allow it honestly, sometimes the beauty of the sport is to see the pure talents that come around every generation or so...guess it's just my opinion though

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP