Originally posted by vincebond
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Infamous emails sent from Team Pacquiao to Team mayweather
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Eastbay Giant View PostTim Smith has yet to recant his story, and has been quiet since. This tells me he's sticking by it, and is most likely with representation. That's all I have left to say on the email issue.
they could easily show the emails (if they actually had it) without revealing their sources.
so in short, unless the emails surface, they in effect, don't exist.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AFighter4U View Posti have to say that i'm quite surprised that both Tim Smith and Teddy Atlas haven't been called out more often for those emails.
they could easily show the emails (if they actually had it) without revealing their sources.
so in short, unless the emails surface, they in effect, don't exist.
Now...
Presenting it to the judge establishes reasonable doubt in Pacquiao's case, and serves as a defensive response to the suit.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eastbay Giant View PostIn this situation, the fans and court of public opinion doesn't matter. Pacquiao filed a law suit, and it's a legal matter now. Releasing the email to the public for debate, help Pacquiao establish intent to slander, because the act alone shows pre-meditation...get it?
Now...
Presenting it to the judge establishes reasonable doubt in Pacquiao's case, and serves as a defensive response to the suit.
slander is when you accuse someone without proof. the emails are proof.
it is to mr. smith and Atlas' benefit if they could produce the emails as proof of their statements. otherwise, all that stuff they said was slander.
and they don't need to wait to be sued to produce those emails. as a journalist, its mr. smiths responsibility to produce proof of his allegations.
so far, he has not.Last edited by AFighter4U; 06-27-2011, 02:43 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AFighter4U View Posterr... it isn't slander if the emails come from Pac camp themselves. how can it be slander when you are basically quoting the said person? you just have to prove that they guy said what you said he said.
slander is when you accuse someone without proof. the emails are proof.
it is to mr. smith and Atlas' benefit if they could produce the emails as proof of their statements. otherwise, all that stuff they said was slander.
Comment
-
its has been a long time and the email was never shown to the public, probably its not authenticated, anyway if that email existed it should have been speicmen as evidence in court ...
but like I said unauthenticated and most probably untrue ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by JOM'S View Postits has been a long time and the email was never shown to the public, probably its not authenticated, anyway if that email existed it should have been speicmen as evidence in court ...
but like I said unauthenticated and most probably untrue ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by AFighter4U View Posterr... it isn't slander if the emails come from Pac camp themselves. how can it be slander when you are basically quoting the said person? you just have to prove that they guy said what you said he said.
slander is when you accuse someone without proof. the emails are proof.
it is to mr. smith and Atlas' benefit if they could produce the emails as proof of their statements. otherwise, all that stuff they said was slander.
and they don't need to wait to be sued to produce those emails. as a journalist, its mr. smiths responsibility to produce proof of his allegations.
so far, he has not.
the people who have these e-mails could be compelled to produce these e-mails lest they be hit with withholding evidences and obstruction of justice...
pbf not submitting the deposition is a very big indicator they don't have any proof...
gbp making amends to pac also is indicative of the above.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eastbay Giant View PostDude, I really don't care. Manny's lawsuit against Floyd is another reason why the fight isn't happening. Believe what you want to believe, but understand our opinions doesn't matter in the court of law. The case is upon Manny to prove he was slandered, defamed, whatever you choose to call it. Maybe you should watch a couple of episodes of Peoples Court, to get a general idea of how the system works.
dela hoya apologized, and the case against him was dropped. it is that easy.
i was never talking about the court case in the first place.
i merely pointed out that basically, mr. smith and teddy atlas accused pac's camp of sending incriminating emails...
without producing such emails.
last time i checked, legitimate journalists are supposed to have proof and/or evidence to back up their claims, ESPECIALLY when it involves a person's reputation.
in that regard, Mr. Smith and Atlas failed miserably.
Comment
-
Originally posted by J Dubb II 330 View PostJust posted on fighthype, mayweather mail. Just making a topic, posting a story
Nothing to see here.
Comment
Comment