What damage has Floyd done to Mannys career?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hamaru
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jun 2011
    • 152
    • 7
    • 4
    • 6,209

    #61
    I never looked up so much Manny clips and articles about his previous fights until Floyd came along. If anything, he gained more exposure.

    Comment

    • jtiger777
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2011
      • 2569
      • 64
      • 136
      • 2,721

      #62
      Originally posted by KitangKatag
      So it looked stranged, and i agree with you that its not illegal and that both of them will be participating nothing wrong with that.

      It simple doesn't make sense at all, there have been some biggest fights in the history of boxing and none of them demanded extra assurances. They rather get it on see who will come out the winner.

      Why demand and extra test when that's the commissioners job? and like i said Floyd didn't enforced this changed to the commissioner only when he fights why?

      If the commissioners procedure is out of date and so uneffective why aren't they adapting to OSDT? whats stopping them from doing so? can you actually give an answer to this?

      Manny demanded 10 million as a deterent to floyd from coming up extra on the weight, he did it to marquez didn't he?
      So has any of those fighters i mentioned showed any signs of a brain injury for fighting Manny? If NO is the answer then floyd's test doesn't have a solid ground to stand into.
      is it the commisions rule to make a fighter pay 10mil per pound over? has pac ever came into a fight over wieght b4?

      http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Ma...ico_Torrecampo

      u see how this can be an never ending argument if u question floyd for demanding a test?

      even if floyds demand had no solid ground its still a demand right? where is the rule that ur demand has to have solid grounds???? u cant dig into your personal feelings or emotions when dealing with business!!! fights have contracts and both fighters have the right to demand things in the contracts and BOTH FIGHTERS DID SO!!! one aggreed and the other didnt its that simple!

      and maybe its a money issue of why they arent going the ost route, but we are talking about this fight not boxing as a whole. lets deal with this fight

      Comment

      • comanick
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Nov 2007
        • 349
        • 44
        • 0
        • 7,526

        #63
        Originally posted by KitangKatag
        So it looked stranged, and i agree with you that its not illegal and that both of them will be participating nothing wrong with that.

        It simple doesn't make sense at all, there have been some biggest fights in the history of boxing and none of them demanded extra assurances. They rather get it on see who will come out the winner.

        Why demand and extra test when that's the commissioners job? and like i said Floyd didn't enforced this changed to the commissioner only when he fights why?

        If the commissioners procedure is out of date and so uneffective why aren't they adapting to OSDT? whats stopping them from doing so? can you actually give an answer to this?

        Manny demanded 10 million as a deterent to floyd from coming up extra on the weight, he did it to marquez didn't he?

        So has any of those fighters i mentioned showed any signs of a brain injury for fighting Manny? If NO is the answer then floyd's test doesn't have a solid ground to stand into.
        thats a simple question that i actually have 2 answers for:

        1. The cost to do these test on a regular basis would take away from the comissions profit.

        2. Many boxers would get caught and that would damage the integrity of the sport and in turn take money out of the commision pocket.

        Boxing is all about money.

        Do you think random testing is ineffective? Is random testing something that you are against in sports? Just wondering.

        Comment

        • cixthree
          I love Manny Pacquaio
          • Nov 2008
          • 2221
          • 152
          • 0
          • 8,387

          #64
          Originally posted by JoeDaWg
          Enough to land his ass in court. U can't even log onto a boxing website without reading 1000 threads about peds and manny pacquiao. There is absolutely nothing wrong with any celebrity defending their brand name and reputation. Just because floyds ok with being branded as a wanna be thug who beats up women, doesn't mean everyone else is cool with having a low life drug addict reputation. And with his half baked media blitz that's just what floyd was trying to accomplish. He lives in the sewer, and he tried to drag manny down there with him. Hopefully he'll lose the case and scratch a fat check, if might serve as a nice lesson for future morons who choose to attack other people in the media without one shred of evidence to back up there claims. It's called "slander", it's serious, and if u don't understand it u really shouldn't start threads about it.
          WOW, look at lil miss snappy!!
          I was only asking a question, and by you reply I'd take it you have a switch to your walk...
          So basically every comedian on earth should be sued for slander?

          Comment

          • eklok
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2009
            • 1492
            • 79
            • 0
            • 1,731

            #65
            this time the mayweathers should just learn to STFU!!!

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP