Originally posted by JAS_JAS
View Post
You clearly don't know boxing but you sure know a lot about hype.
Ask yourself:
Why does Pacquiao ONLY fight guys who just lost?
Why does Pacquiao use catchweights in a division where he can make the weight?
Why are the majority of Pacquiao's paper titles vacant or interim belts? You do know what that means, right? It means that Pacquiao wasn't fighting the champion in the division in which he got a belt!
Look at Pacquiao's last 6 opponents. They all have big names, but at the point when Pacquiao was willing to face them they had all lost, dropped in rank and had no title. Many of them lost after having to cut weight even though Pacquiao could make 147lbs, and one was even banned at the time they fought, so Arum greased some palms so that Texas would look the other way.
Are you kidding me? ALL OF THAT doesn't set off any red flags in your tiny little mind? The fact that out of Pacquiao's glorious 8 divisions titles, many of them being vacant and interim belts, doesn't factor in that his so-called dominance of the sport is a manufactured media hype job? The fact that Pacquiao hadn't fought anyone YOU know until his 41st fight doesn't mean anything to you? That's some EXTRA THICK PADDING!!
You should really learn something about the man you're defending before you make an ass out of yourself.
That "he's a little guy" excuse is old and tired. He's 2" shorter than Mayweather and Mosley. He's not a little guy anymore and hasn't been for years. Pacquiao just gets special treatment because he uses that excuse to justify using catchweights at 147lbs ... a weight he could always have made.
If Mosley or Floyd .. hell any boxer would have pulled this ****, they would have been beheaded by the media. ****, I would prefer Pacquiao be on drugs rather than have such a shady record and then claim to be the a top boxer.
Comment