I was just looking at the betting odds. Haye is 8/5 to beat Wlad in some places, whereas Rhodes is 6/1 to beat Alvarez.
To me it seems like it should be the other way around, or at least that Rhodes has a better chance of winning his fight.
Wlad is in his prime and usually beats his opponents without losing a round. Haye has IMO not looked too hot in heavyweight performances.
Although Rhodes is flawed, he's up against a boxer who is still green and learning his craft. At this stage, Alvarez is hittable and has been hurt against lesser punches. Rhodes has the advantage of size (he spent most of his career at 160, Alvarez has never even faced at 154lber) and experience.
Your thoughts?
To me it seems like it should be the other way around, or at least that Rhodes has a better chance of winning his fight.
Wlad is in his prime and usually beats his opponents without losing a round. Haye has IMO not looked too hot in heavyweight performances.
Although Rhodes is flawed, he's up against a boxer who is still green and learning his craft. At this stage, Alvarez is hittable and has been hurt against lesser punches. Rhodes has the advantage of size (he spent most of his career at 160, Alvarez has never even faced at 154lber) and experience.
Your thoughts?
Comment