Froch and Calzaghe. Career-wise, who deserves more props?!?!

[King_Lukas]

Froch by a mile, he may have lost to Kessler, but that was a home town decision anyway.

Calzaghe was a coward, he ducked all the top fighters of his time, only fought old men and average contenders, and not in a million years did he beat Hopkins.

No contest....

[Welsh Jon]

looking at your name im guessing your welsh, if your wernt welsh you wouldnt be a calzaghe fan he is very overatted

Yep I'm Welsh. I've watched nearly all of Calzaghe's title fights, which i certainly wouldn't have done if I wasn't Welsh, since a lot of them were very poor! I'm sure if I wasn't Welsh, but I watched the Calzaghe-Lacey and Calzaghe-Kessler fights than I would still have had to rate his abilities cos they were both impressive performences.

[Drunk Punch]

Personally I think Calzaghe had skills that Froch could only dream about. Froch has the better resume cos he took the risks and he deserves the accolades. But I think a prime Calzaghe could beat anyone at 168-175.

[Abstraction]

Calzaghe would never have joined the Super Six.

I cant rate anyone who takes a dodgy SD against a 44 year old and runs torwards a faded 40 year old RJJ who should have retired years ago

[Pullcounter]

Cokezaghe ducked Johnson 3x... Froch actually fought glen and beat him. Froch deserves more props than cokezaghe