Carl Froch or Joe Calzaghe? Better resume?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Froch clearly fought the tougher competition.
Calzaghe has a slightly better resume at the moment but Froch is on the verge of overtaking him.Comment
-
the hopkins win was a SD (which means joe really didn't beat hopkins) it's not even worth mentioning since MANY feel that joe lost it (and joe REFUSED a rematch to prove otherwise) calzaghie did beat kessler......
i would say froch's resume looks a bit better to be honest.Comment
-
i don't think it catches up to calzaghe's competition yet
but now that i think about it im impressed at the lvl of competition froch has fought in the last years wouldn't have been possible without the super 6
guys like pacquiao should learn from itComment
-
ehhh..... pacquiao had a better run before without a tournament.
people are underrating pacquiao too much.
it seems like he's been taking on easy fights but if you look at it , he's fight the best welterweights ranked. (aside from floyd)Comment
Comment