Mayweather unbeatable?
Collapse
-
-
-
one thing has got nothing to do with the other.
lennox decisively won his rematch against rahman.
does that mean he never really lost the 1st fight even though he was ktfo?Comment
-
What?
So winning a rematch justifies a controversial decision? That makes no sense.
Castillo landed more shots at a higher percentage and controlled the pace, action of the fight. A lot of people who've watched that fight agree Castillo won, including the commentators. A rematch has no bearing on the outcome of that match.
But really, all that needed to be said in this thread was- no fighter is unbeatable.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
That's great that you think that, but ringside judges have a their own perception. So what happened in the second fight?What?
So winning a rematch justifies a controversial decision? That makes no sense.
Castillo landed more shots at a higher percentage and controlled the pace, action of the fight. A lot of people who've watched that fight agree Castillo won, including the commentators. A rematch has no bearing on the outcome of that match.
But really, all that needed to be said in this thread was- no fighter is unbeatable.
Also, compubox doesn't decide fights, it's merely a measuring stick that isn't 100% accurate. It's punches tallied by human beings.Comment
-
Comment

Comment