Originally posted by vincebond
View Post
Ultimately Dirrell outlanded him 5-1 and hurt him which should be enough to win the fight but apparently the judges were giving out points for mauling in the clinch and illegal tactics instead.
Froch was rabbit punching, hitting on the break and even threw Dirrell to the canvas like it was WWE, yet it was Dirrell who was penalized by the dumb **** referee for leaning on Froch's back, something he had not even been warned for in the entire fight.
I know Dirrell won that fight, but because his style was bull**** and because he only had to do a little bit more to make it obvious and chose not to, it's hard to really make a big fuss about the decision going Froch's way.
Comment