Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Froch: Dirrell and Abraham Were Easy, Johnson No Match!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by vincebond View Post
    I grew up on boxing. Nice try. You actually think Froch won that fight?
    It's not so much that people think Froch won the fight, just that they did not like the way Dirrell fought and didn't mind the decision for that reason.

    Ultimately Dirrell outlanded him 5-1 and hurt him which should be enough to win the fight but apparently the judges were giving out points for mauling in the clinch and illegal tactics instead.

    Froch was rabbit punching, hitting on the break and even threw Dirrell to the canvas like it was WWE, yet it was Dirrell who was penalized by the dumb **** referee for leaning on Froch's back, something he had not even been warned for in the entire fight.

    I know Dirrell won that fight, but because his style was bull**** and because he only had to do a little bit more to make it obvious and chose not to, it's hard to really make a big fuss about the decision going Froch's way.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Lorily View Post


      Why do you say that Wess?

      Because I think Ward vs Froch would be a hell of a fight and Froch would get an ass beating to the point he wouldn't be able to say "I think I won that fight", just like he did vs Dirrell and Kessler.

      Do I want Johnson to lose? No, but I want to see Ward destroy Froch. At the end of the day no matter how it plays, Ward takes it home.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by vincebond View Post
        I grew up on boxing. Nice try. You actually think Froch won that fight?
        I did I felt Froch made the fight,I score effective boxing and that's not what Dirrell was doing he was doing everything in his power to not be engaged..It was a close fight but Froch did not lose this fight..

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Hitman932 View Post
          It's not so much that people think Froch won the fight, just that they did not like the way Dirrell fought and didn't mind the decision for that reason.

          Ultimately Dirrell outlanded him 5-1 and hurt him which should be enough to win the fight but apparently the judges were giving out points for mauling in the clinch and illegal tactics instead.

          Froch was rabbit punching, hitting on the break and even threw Dirrell to the canvas like it was WWE, yet it was Dirrell who was penalized by the dumb **** referee for leaning on Froch's back, something he had not even been warned for in the entire fight.

          I know Dirrell won that fight, but because his style was bull**** and because he only had to do a little bit more to make it obvious and chose not to, it's hard to really make a big fuss about the decision going Froch's way.
          Dirrell was warned multiple times to stop holding,Froch's dirty tactics came about from Dirrell's dirty tactics of holding then running..It was a b!tchazz game plan he had..Which was to jab while moving backward then clinch when Froch was in punching range..Holding is not permitted in boxing and all of Froch's dirty moves was done in result of the consistent holding tactic that Dirrell was using..Once again I'm yet to see Froch hurt..Even when Taylor drop him he was not hurt..



          This is how you look when ya get hurt..

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by romebyko View Post
            I did I felt Froch made the fight,I score effective boxing and that's not what Dirrell was doing he was doing everything in his power to not be engaged..It was a close fight but Froch did not lose this fight..
            so according to you rabbit punching, hitting between break, and body slams is effective boxing. I think mma is better suited for you

            Comment


            • #56
              Everytime I start to like Froch a bit, he has to open his mouth and say unbelievable ****** things. He dominated Dirrell ? Johnson has no skills ?

              Glen Johnson has 10 times the skills Froch has. I hope The road warrior puts a beating on him and stops him in his tracks.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by dorruel2.0 View Post
                so according to you rabbit punching, hitting between break, and body slams is effective boxing. I think mma is better suited for you
                I already broke down the dirty Tactics of BOTH Fighters..

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Brouillard View Post
                  Everytime I start to like Froch a bit, he has to open his mouth and say unbelievable ****** things. He dominated Dirrell ? Johnson has no skills ?

                  Glen Johnson has 10 times the skills Froch has. I hope The road warrior puts a beating on him and stops him in his tracks.
                  I understand your situation, i respect Froch and try to like the guy. But his ignorance and the fact hes sooo delusional makes it difficult to do so. **** Froch dude is an overachiever and i hope Johnson ends him at the top level.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Lorily View Post
                    Agree with this...

                    Johnson will be in it for every minute of every round and Froch is right, Johnson will be coming at him for all 12 (I don't see a K.O. for either) to be hit. But I think it will wear Froch down more then he expects. Johnson is the type that doesn't mind taking 2 to land 1 and he'll never stop. The problem for Glen is that he's always getting screwed by the judges. Hell, two judges had Green winning the fight against Johnson when the K.O. happened for crying out loud. Johnson (quite literally) knocked the snot out of Green, with Green stumbling back to his corner numerous times - and the judges still had Green winning. That's disgusting right there! Johnson is going to have to be completely dominate in order to get a fair shake, but I think it's going to be a pretty close, tough fight. And close fights never go Glens way.
                    No, Glen isn't that type of fighter. That would be Margarito. Glen has a much better defense than people realize. He is always aware of the incoming punches or counters, and he's hard to hit cleanly.

                    And even with dominant performances, Glen has been robbed before. Just think about Glen VS Woods I. Ugly robbery, and Glen dominated the fight. Also, most people involved in the Super six and even the fans prefer to see Froch win so that we get a Euro vs an American in the finals. If I were Glen, I would not only want to be dominant, I would want to score a KO.
                    Last edited by Tiozzo; 05-28-2011, 02:51 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Brouillard View Post
                      No, Glen isn't that type of fighter. That would be Margarito. Glen has a much better defense than people realize. He is always aware of the incoming punches or counters, and he's hard to hit cleanly.

                      And even with dominant performances, Glen has been robbed before. Just think about Glen VS Woods I. Ugly robbery, and Glen dominated the fight. Also, most people involved in the Super six and even the fans prefer to see Froch win so that we get a Euro vs an American in the finals. If I were Glen, I would not only want to be dominant, I would want to score a KO.
                      Glen will lose and there will be no doubt who the winner is..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP