Comments Thread For: Pacquiao-Marquez Tour To Start in Manila, End in Mexico

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LeadUppercut
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 13387
    • 305
    • 869
    • 13,720

    #91
    Originally posted by DominiBox
    hahahahaahahahahaha....... This ****** guy don't even know the real drama. Floyd weighted 2 pounds over the limmit. He paid $US 300,000 for each pound...

    So...basic math says: 2 x 300,000 = 600,000

    That's what he paid for the violation !!!

    Floyd's people called Marquez people to convince them to change the weigh issue. But they said "NO"

    ******.... those are FACTS.
    YOU ABSOLUTE ****HEAD !!

    What a moron you are kid

    What sort of a clown would make a categoric statement and insist that he is correct, when he CLEARLY wouldnt have a clue..... WHAT A ****HEAD !!

    The contracted penalty clause for that fight was $500k per-pound, of which, 50% was to be paid directly to the NSAC. Mayflower saved himself $400k by re-negotiating the contract with Team Marquez prior to the fight, and Marquez received an extra $100k, $600k in total.

    You CLEARLY wouldnt have a clue, so why the *** would you simply make stuff up like that?

    What a Wally !!

    Comment

    • LeadUppercut
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 13387
      • 305
      • 869
      • 13,720

      #92
      Originally posted by WESS
      No you ******. If he hadnt (keyword) CHANGED the contract he would have had to pay 1 million in fines. He paid the 600k to change the weight limit so he wouldnt have had to pay the 1 million.

      Your too ****** to see that no matter what Floyd had weighed JMM would have still been shyt at WW. 2 pounds wouldn't have made a difference.....much like Cotto if he could have weighed 147 vs Pac
      Exactly, Dominidiot completely made that up, what a clown that kid is

      Comment

      • LeadUppercut
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 13387
        • 305
        • 869
        • 13,720

        #93
        Originally posted by puga
        no.....floyd vs jmm was'nt legit becase floyd fought him at his own weightclass two div higher than jmm's last fight and he was HUGE as **** compared to jmm given there was never a sign that jmm could compete with a guy way bigger than him........that is why it was'nt legit...now, if floyd and jmm were simlar in size , it would've been LEGIT!.....how you mofos not see that is beyond me....
        You dopey clown.

        Mayweather " was HUGE as **** compared to jmm " because Marquez is a lightweight and Floyd is a welter.

        Marquez looked small, fat, and slow, above 140..... I know it, you know it, and MANNY KNOWS IT !!..... ya Wally.

        You say this.....
        "there was never a sign that jmm could compete with a guy way bigger than him........that is why it was'nt legit"

        Well, now there IS a sign that JMM cannot compete at welter, and Manny picked him anyway...... you fkn genius, are you saying that you can clearly see that Marquez is too small for welter, and yet Manny cant?

        If you dont think that JMM over 140 is a fair fight, then how the hell can you give Manny " talk to my plomoter " Pacquiao any credit for fighting Marquez under THOSE EXACT SAME CONDITIONS.

        You two-faced Wally kid

        Comment

        • spoonwars
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 2635
          • 151
          • 69
          • 8,813

          #94
          Originally posted by LeadUppercut
          " every little detail "

          Dude, there are a hell of a lot of those " little details " concerning Pac's last 8 opponents, but I guess you may not have noticed all of them
          Hey, at least Pac makes the original contracted weight unlike another lb-for-lb fighter currently on vacation-no-wait-look-at-me-ok-i'm-back-on-vacation.
          Last edited by spoonwars; 05-28-2011, 03:35 AM.

          Comment

          • spoonwars
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 2635
            • 151
            • 69
            • 8,813

            #95
            Originally posted by LeadUppercut
            I think that is a totally absurd thing to say..... RIDICULOUS, in fact.

            Martinez, Bradley, Ward, Hopkins, Froch, ALL have a better recent resume than Pacquiao..... even my boy Mares outdoes Pac with Perez, Vic, then Agbeko.

            Manny Pacquiao's last 7 opponents.....

            Lately, a number of observers have commented that all of Manny Pacquiao's recent opponents have either been old, faded, or inept. Let's take a closer look at Pac's recent fights, and see if there is any truth to that allegation.....

            Accusations leveled at Pacquiao include.....

            * Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
            * Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is coming off a win
            * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

            Let's apply that criteria to Manny's last 7 opponents, and see how they stack up.

            ====================================

            David Diaz - Not a top fighter, faded, disadvantaged.....
            * Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
            * Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
            * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

            Oscar De La Hoya - Shot, drained, and shrink-wrapped.....
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
            * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

            Ricky Hatton - Not a top fighter, faded, and disadvantaged.....
            * Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
            * Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
            * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

            Miguel Angel Cotto - Badly faded / shopworn, and disadvantaged.....
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is coming off a win
            * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

            Joshua Clottey - Not a top fighter, and strangely innocuous.....
            * Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
            * Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
            * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

            Antonio Margarito - Not a top fighter, faded, disadvantaged.....
            * Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
            * Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
            * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

            Shane Mosley - Faded, shopworn, and disadvantaged.....
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
            * Manny will not fight anybody who is coming off a win
            * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

            ====================================

            All-in-all, that is a damn shabby line-up for a supposed P4P fighter, especially when you consider all of the advantages afforded to Pac during those fights..... e.g. fighting for a vacant JMW title, at catch-weight, against a BUM, and using 8oz gloves

            Now, I can understand a top fighter taking the odd bout against a lesser opponent.....
            but EVERY opponent in your last 7 fights?

            How fkn lame is that ?

            The last time Pacquiao fought a live dog was Marquez II, and according to a significant number of trainers/fighters/journalists/analysts..... HE LOST!!

            SUMMARY: There is no question that Manny Pacquiao is a very carefully manufactured fighter with a padded resume'.
            Yeah, and when was the last time your action hero fought a live dog?

            Pretty Vacation Boy Jr's last 7 fights in comparison:

            Shane Mosley -- inactive over a year; aged and not sharp
            Juan Manuel Marquez -- much smaller; mwj did not make original contracted weight
            Ricky Hatton -- known to continuously poison himself with junk food; little boxing skills; fought over natural weight class
            Oscar De La Hoya -- faded and shopworn
            Carlos Manuel Baldomir -- faded slow ass mofo
            Zab Judah -- beat by faded slow ass mofo
            Sharmba Mitchell -- zzzzz

            Comment

            • Brooklyn Iceman
              Banned
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • May 2011
              • 296
              • 11
              • 0
              • 364

              #96
              you are an ignorant fool that's full of ****, you Bozo. Just shut your stinking ****y mouth and put back jmm's pencil d1ck back in your mouth..! clown like you should put back rat hole where you belong..pathethic loser!

              Originally posted by LeadUppercut
              I think that is a totally absurd thing to say..... RIDICULOUS, in fact.

              Martinez, Bradley, Ward, Hopkins, Froch, ALL have a better recent resume than Pacquiao..... even my boy Mares outdoes Pac with Perez, Vic, then Agbeko.

              Manny Pacquiao's last 7 opponents.....

              Lately, a number of observers have commented that all of Manny Pacquiao's recent opponents have either been old, faded, or inept. Let's take a closer look at Pac's recent fights, and see if there is any truth to that allegation.....

              Accusations leveled at Pacquiao include.....

              * Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
              * Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is coming off a win
              * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

              Let's apply that criteria to Manny's last 7 opponents, and see how they stack up.

              ====================================

              David Diaz - Not a top fighter, faded, disadvantaged.....
              * Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
              * Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
              * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

              Oscar De La Hoya - Shot, drained, and shrink-wrapped.....
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
              * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

              Ricky Hatton - Not a top fighter, faded, and disadvantaged.....
              * Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
              * Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
              * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

              Miguel Angel Cotto - Badly faded / shopworn, and disadvantaged.....
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is coming off a win
              * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

              Joshua Clottey - Not a top fighter, and strangely innocuous.....
              * Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
              * Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
              * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

              Antonio Margarito - Not a top fighter, faded, disadvantaged.....
              * Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
              * Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
              * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

              Shane Mosley - Faded, shopworn, and disadvantaged.....
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
              * Manny will not fight anybody who is coming off a win
              * Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

              ====================================

              All-in-all, that is a damn shabby line-up for a supposed P4P fighter, especially when you consider all of the advantages afforded to Pac during those fights..... e.g. fighting for a vacant JMW title, at catch-weight, against a BUM, and using 8oz gloves

              Now, I can understand a top fighter taking the odd bout against a lesser opponent.....
              but EVERY opponent in your last 7 fights?

              How fkn lame is that ?

              The last time Pacquiao fought a live dog was Marquez II, and according to a significant number of trainers/fighters/journalists/analysts..... HE LOST!!

              SUMMARY: There is no question that Manny Pacquiao is a very carefully manufactured fighter with a padded resume'.

              Comment

              • komandante
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jul 2008
                • 3579
                • 184
                • 14
                • 24,294

                #97
                I didn't know that Marquez fought David Diaz, what I know is he fought Juan Diaz and beat him twice and he thought that was Pacquiao. Maybe as a result of drinking too much pee.

                Comment

                • komandante
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 3579
                  • 184
                  • 14
                  • 24,294

                  #98
                  Originally posted by Brooklyn Iceman
                  you are an ignorant fool that's full of ****, you Bozo. Just shut your stinking ****y mouth and put back jmm's pencil d1ck back in your mouth..! clown like you should put back rat hole where you belong..pathethic loser!
                  your post are all non sense and mostly excuses only, prove that you adore the fraud Teddy Atlas isn't it moron.

                  Comment

                  • flint
                    Pac smashed my mom
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 5814
                    • 236
                    • 0
                    • 6,130

                    #99
                    Originally posted by indystress
                    did you just call 36yr old marquez old?
                    arent you one of the pac hater that thinks pac is avoiding sergio martinez, who is also 36.
                    you are a dummy.

                    Comment

                    • Rapid Counter
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2011
                      • 3164
                      • 392
                      • 724
                      • 10,416

                      #100
                      Originally posted by indystress
                      did you just call 36yr old marquez old?
                      arent you one of the pac hater that thinks pac is avoiding sergio martinez, who is also 36.

                      so what is it? is being 36yrs old being old? or not?

                      make up your mind...
                      you cant say this is B/S that pac is fighting a 36 yr old marquez,
                      and at the same time saying pac should fight 36yr old sergio martinez

                      matter of fact, i bet you were one of the pac haters wishing to see marquez/pac, but once this fight got made, you are against it...its like no matter what the situation, you are always ready to hate on pac, HAHAHA...what evahz

                      btw, how do you weight gain a guy that will weigh about the same as pac on fight nite?
                      Marquez is 37 and will be 38 when they actually fight. Just thought you should know that so you look like less of a ****** in future posts. You are welcome

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP