Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

bhop has the best resume in boxing right now

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by PACATTACK View Post
    what the hell does it matter? It's how many years since?

    Manny didn't have an amateur career like is the norm in the states. Same with Hopkins.
    Thats why they made their mistakes early in their career.

    It's about what they accomplished, and how great they were. Not about some early losses that are completely irrelevant to their legacy.
    manny had an ametuer career..manny was 60-4

    http://search.yahoo.com/r/_ylt=A0oG7...Manny_Pacquiao
    Last edited by Larry the boss; 05-23-2011, 05:54 PM.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by PACATTACK View Post
      what the hell does it matter? It's how many years since?

      Manny didn't have an amateur career like is the norm in the states. Same with Hopkins.
      Thats why they made their mistakes early in their career.

      It's about what they accomplished, and how great they were. Not about some early losses that are completely irrelevant to their legacy.
      manny had an ametuer career..manny was 60-4 do your research son

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by LarryX2011 View Post
        manny had an ametuer career..manny was 60-4 do your research son
        1) i for sure am not your son.
        2) please read that sentence again. Manny and b-hop did not have the amateur career that is the norm in US. That doesn't mean he/she/it were without fights. Is going pro at recently turned 16 the norm?

        I stand by the point that Manny mostly learnt his trade within the pro-ring. Same with hopkins. And therefore the blemishes on their record is more understandable than that of Floyd or Roy.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Pacdbest View Post
          Bhop is not even close to Pac! Pac annihilated bigger guys and HOFamer opponents!

          Bhop just beaten average, young but smaller opponents!

          Pac just make it look easy! But Pac has beaten the best in each div he's in. Berto was just beaten by Pac's sparring partner! wassa's fav fighter was just Pac's part time punching bag.

          THere's nothing for Pac to accomplice but to catch that pusssy that keeps running away.
          Pac annihilated bigger guys and HOFamer opponents! - When they were about to retire.

          Pac has beaten the best in each div he's in. - He ducked EVERYONE @ 135 except David Diaz.

          Berto was just beaten by Pac's sparring partner! - Wrong. Mosely just got beat by Ortiz sparring partner.

          THere's nothing for Pac to accomplice - Youre right. So get off his nuts.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by PACATTACK View Post
            1) i for sure am not your son.
            2) please read that sentence again. Manny and b-hop did not have the amateur career that is the norm in US. That doesn't mean he/she/it were without fights. Is going pro at recently turned 16 the norm?

            I stand by the point that Manny mostly learnt his trade within the pro-ring. Same with hopkins. And therefore the blemishes on their record is more understandable than that of Floyd or Roy.
            manny had 64 fights son..save the excuses

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by LarryX2011 View Post
              manny had 64 fights son..save the excuses
              i dont even get manny pacquiao's backstory anymore

              i saw a pic and have heard he did muay thai
              and he started his pro career at 16

              so did he try muay thai after starting his boxing pro career?
              and his amatuer fights he probabley fought all those in a month and at around 14-15

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by LarryX2011 View Post
                manny had 64 fights son..save the excuses
                yes, i am able to read.

                Does that take away from my point? Boy?

                Comment


                • #48
                  i disagree.tarver and pascal are his best wins and thats because they were actually fighting it what is considered their best weight while the majority of his big wins are from opponents moving up(oscar,winky,pavlik) and as far as glenn johnson goes thats like give margarito credit for beating martinez,i know since i don't agree with th ts that most of you will probably say i'm a hater but i'm just keeping it official and i have much respect for hopkins regardless what anyone thinks.carl froch is someone who actually has a good resume yet doesn't get that much credit and with a couple more wins his resume could look better than bernards

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by PACATTACK View Post
                    yes, i am able to read.

                    Does that take away from my point? Boy?
                    you have no point son

                    Comment


                    • #50

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP