****m Richardson "We exposed Manny Pacquiao"

[hugh grant]

haha, look at the *******s ignoring what ****m is talkign about. he exposed pac cant deal with boxers and movement. but we knew this already ****m. thats why pac didnt want to fight JMM til now, didnt want yuri, ducked floyd and sergio

You and reloaded are worse than Teddy Atlas in pretending you dont think Pac is the greatest boxer who ever lived.

[Chuckguy]

lets see,

Shane hurt floyd. Shane never hurt pac.

Shane got dropped by pac, shane never went down against floyd.

Shane landed more punches on floyd than pac.

Shane lost every round to pac. Shane won a round against floyd.


Yet a injured pac got exposed?

bull**** he wasnt injured
it was just an excuse to cover up how bad he looked
Im not saying he didnt win convincingly but he looke really bad in doing so
pac hits harder than floyd
yes
shane didnt land on pac cause he didnt throw
man OJ you are blind too

[ergheiz]

Brother ****m,what the hell are you on? Because I definitely want some of it!

[Swag Hustla]

If Shane actually landed some counters and maybe like, uh, won a round or two, I might agree with ****m.

Pac always looks awkward fighting guys who move a lot and are defensive minded. Nothing new here.

Barrera in the rematch, Clottey, and Mosley were able frustrate and annoy Pac, but they weren't able to give Pac any kind of trouble the way Marquez and Morales in the first fight were able to.

Running and avoiding all contact will give Pac fits and make him look bad, but you have to actually mount some offense to "expose" him.

Shane exposed himself against Pac.

[Ragnar Lothbrok]

bull**** he wasnt injured
it was just an excuse to cover up how bad he looked
Im not saying he didnt win convincingly but he looke really bad in doing so
pac hits harder than floyd
yes
shane didnt land on pac cause he didnt throw
man OJ you are blind too

yes he was. al bernstein talked about this in the middle rounds how pac wasnt moving as well as he usually does & pac confirmed it in the interview.

[Pacquiao'd]

You and reloaded are worse than Teddy Atlas in pretending you dont think Pac is the greatest boxer who ever lived.

bwahahaha. god you fool are ******ed

[fabie]

These kinds of statements are supposedly reserved for the winners.....hahahahha. Exposed? That's a pathetic way of losing and not admitting...

[KingTito]

Come on now. That's a bit much.

[Webber676]

I like Naazim, think he's one of the great ambassadors for boxing, but come on man. How do you lose every round, get knocked down, run away from round 3 on, only land 66 total punches... and then have the nerve to claim you 'exposed' a fighter.

I think Cotto, Clottey, and Margarito have MUCH better arguments for having 'exposed' Pacquiao.

For give him, after all its human nature. Thats the least moral victory they could get.

[hypodermical]

wow... is pac that good now?
that was him getting exposed???
so that was pac having a bad fight???

id be scared too if i was floyd...