****m Richardson "We exposed Manny Pacquiao"

[ronnie_N.]

****m exposed himself in that the only thing he is good at is watching other fighters handwraps

ahahahahahahahahha!!!!!!!! true that

[Guest]

Margarito hurt Pacquiao several times, especially in the sixth round when he doubled him up in pain. Pacquiao said afterwards that he was lucky to survive that round. Shane never came close to hurting Pacquiao.

At least Margarito tried. As soon as Shane got hurt, he backed the **** up the rest of the fight.

Shane wasn't letting go with the right hand for fear of what was gonna come back at him, a nice hurtin short left counter.

[Pin Galarga]

But lost to him.... What's the point?

[Reloaded]

I like Naazim, think he's one of the great ambassadors for boxing, but come on man. How do you lose every round, get knocked down, run away from round 3 on, only land 66 total punches... and then have the nerve to claim you 'exposed' a fighter.

I think Cotto, Clottey, and Margarito have MUCH better arguments for having 'exposed' Pacquiao.

Because they exposed how lost he is with just a little speed and movement , funny you didnt see that lol .

[Mr. Philadel]

it amazes me how ppl see what they want....I keep hearing ppl say Shane was in running or in retreat...but couldn't see that he was done and couldn't pull the dam trigger..smh....be honest!!....Manny was supposed to be better than he was when he fought JMM...that was the saying....he stepped his right hand up and he was this and that....but we found out that moving targets is STILL a problem for Manny...if you dont stand there or come forward face first....then Manny will hurt his leg.....I guess thats how it is huh?!?....Shane's trainer and supporters are SUPPOSED to believe in their dude...some of you act like it was a crime to say Shane was gonna beat that ass....smh...grow up not down....that dont have **** to do with anything....Shane is way way past his best days and lasted 12 rounds with the world's best....unable to pull the trigger....there were no shots coming from crazy angles and all that flashy ****...naw, it was Manny from back in the days.....good job Naz!!!

[Steak]

thats just plain silly.

Pacquiao cant be 'exposed' at this point of his career. not to mention that hes lost and had trouble in a couple of his fights already, its not like hes ever been considered flawless....

any knowledgable boxing fan already knows that Pacquiao isnt perfect, and has more trouble with certain styles than with others.

[hypodermical]

it amazes me how ppl see what they want...

tell ****m and yourself that buddy...
it was an effing shutout! ****m and shane didnt expose ****! clottey didnt get hit either, so what? clottey and shane never had a shot at winning, the way they "fought" pac.
they exposed that if you just run and not fight, you won't ket KO'd but you'll lose every round. good job!

[Guest]

tell ****m and yourself that buddy...
it was an effing shutout! ****m and shane didnt expose ****! clottey didnt get hit either, so what? clottey and shane never had a shot at winning, the way they "fought" pac.
they exposed that if you just run and not fight, you won't ket KO'd but you'll lose every round. good job!

It's so true.

The only thing this fight proved is Manny can be in crappy fights too if the other guy doesn't throw punches.

[eklok]

shane exposed pac by losing all rounds?

[Pullcounter]

Because they exposed how lost he is with just a little speed and movement , funny you didnt see that lol .

but if you expose someone, you're not supposed to lose... or at least make it a close fight... mosley did neither... so what exactly did mosley expose?

mab already proved in the rematch that if you run from pac you will make it to the 12 rounds... cotto ran from pac and almost made it to the 12th.

so what exactly did naz and mosley expose?