What? ONE more??
Was the Tarver v Johnson decision a robbery?
Collapse
-
It was a real close one. Whether it was a robbery or not, I don't think I'm qualified to say, but that's just how it is in boxing.
That's why I always say..
Once you go black, you'll never go back..Comment
-
tarver's mistake was taking too many breaks. he wasn't active enough. if johnson hadn't pressed the action, this would have likely been a much more boring fight. we need more boxers like johnson who are aggressive and work hard during the fightComment
-
Originally posted by BoxerdogWhenever I see Melvina Lathan is one of the judges, I expect a travesty.
Tarver won. Look at the Compubox numbers.
No ****! That ***** had it 116-112 (8 rounds to 4 Johnson). Yeah it may have not been that impressive, but Tarver won that fight. I had it 7 rounds to 5. The rounds weren't that hard to score at all.....when Tarver took a round off Johnson won it...every other round Tarver out landed him with the cleaner heavier shots.
I'm beginning to ****in hate the sport because there is always this judging bull****!Comment
-
You're a ****ing moron......those are common statements that corner guys give to their fighters to get them to give maximum effort in the last round. Look at the punch stats.......Tarver out landed him by a large margin, and it's not like Johnson is the heavier puncher so he could make up the slack with the more impressive shots. Listen....I respect Johnson for being a good person and a hard worker, but I'm a boxing fan and he did not win the fight. If you think he did then you obviously don't know the sport that well.Originally posted by jpboxer3Listen to the corner between the 11th and 12th!
McGirt to Tarver "You need a Knockout"
Cueller to Johnson "Win this round and its yours!"
NUFF SAID,
Comment
to your mom..
Comment