This Fight Will Prove Pacquiao is NOT Better Than Mayweather

[Vasyl’s dad]

I'm sure u know all those titles came from facing the same style of opponent, slow, flat footed brawler, if already shopworn even better. Shane is just a continuation of fighting a guy who can no longer box or counter effectively.

Barrera was a slow, flat footed brawler?

[Code Red]

its superior mate, pac fought jmm as a lightweight while floyd fought him as a ww which makes a big difference

you will see on saturday why it is superior, all though you should know already

The point I'm making is that the myth created by team pac themselves that Pac will outdo Mayweather is garbage cause Shane even if he is soundly defeated will do better vs Pac than he did against Mayweather, for one, he's going to hit Pac more!!

[Code Red]

Barrera was a slow, flat footed brawler?

Hell yeah! Especially after the Morales trilogy, its called shopworn.

[brick wall]

I'm sure u know all those titles came from facing the same style of opponent, slow, flat footed brawler, if already shopworn even better. Shane is just a continuation of fighting a guy who can no longer box or counter effectively.

do you even know how he won his titles and who the opponents were? if not, just shut the **** up.

[iNDOLiFER]

Of course PAC is gonna get hit more than floyd that's no secret PAC is an offensive fighter so he's gonna get tag more..

[Jack Napier]

Barrera was a slow, flat footed brawler?

Hell yeah! Especially after the Morales trilogy, its called shopworn.

god you're dumb :laugh:
and btw he beat Barrera before the 3rd Terrible fight :laugh:

[Twako]

Hell yeah! Especially after the Morales trilogy, its called shopworn.

the words shot,shopworn,etc has been loosely used around here especially by *****s. MAB won 6 straight after the pac loss, grabbing the WBC SFW title along the way before losing in a controversial fight w/ JMM, which i think MAB had won.

we might as well call PAC shot since his 2 KO losses more than 10yrs ago eh? or shopworn since his EM loss?

dumb *****s

[Code Red]

All Ive been seeing is people say if Shane hit PAC with the punch he hit Floyd with PAC would get stopped. I can't get with that. PAC has a very good chin. He been hit with some big shots and shook those ****s off like they were nothing.

Plus if PAC does get hit hard who is to say he won't get up from it.

Not saying Pac wont get up, especially with those PEDS in his system, but if Shane is able to land easily then he will, frequently and often ala Margarito. Its all about how wreckless Pac chooses to be and if you watch any Pac fight u know he gets wreckless and wild quite often.

[Code Red]

the words shot,shopworn,etc has been loosely used around here especially by *****s. MAB won 6 straight after the pac loss, grabbing the WBC SFW title along the way before losing in a controversial fight w/ JMM, which i think MAB had won.

we might as well call PAC shot since his 2 KO losses more than 10yrs ago eh? or shopworn since his EM loss?

dumb *****s

Look I dont get off on trying to discredit the Barerra win, its one of the few I like, why because it predates the weight draining, not till your shopworn, catchweight king we know today. On that night its not Pac's negotiations that led MAB into giving a slow flat footed shopworn performance, it was his speed. Too bad every opponent afterwards had to be Barrera-like in order for Pac to face them, if they werent then drain'em. Even Shane Mosley right now is Barrera-like in his remaining abilities.

[brick wall]

Not saying Pac wont get up, especially with those PEDS in his system, but if Shane is able to land easily then he will, frequently and often ala Margarito. Its all about how wreckless Pac chooses to be and if you watch any Pac fight u know he gets wreckless and wild quite often.

wreckless or less wreck...that's actually a good thing