This Fight Will Prove Pacquiao is NOT Better Than Mayweather

**lfc19titles** · 05-02-2011, 10:52 AM

everyone knows may has a better defence but what it will also show how pacs attacking ability is far suprerior which is what has mayweather shooooook

**brick wall** · 05-02-2011, 10:55 AM

Originally posted by Code Red

All this talk from Team Pacquiao about how they are going to "outdo" Mayweather is ridiculous. If anything this fight will prove Pac is not as good as Floyd, why?? Cause we're going to see how Pac has no Defensive skills whatsoever, we're going to see how poorly he reacts and handles getting tagged with a big punch, and we're going to see how low his ring IQ is in comparison to Floyd. With that said I still believe Pac will win simply cause the elder Mosley will gas, which Team Pac is banking on, but during Shane's little offensive bursts he's going to catch the 1 dimensional Pacquiao every time. So get your excuses for why Pac got hit so much ready *******s, I say u just better hope Pac doesnt get caught with Shanes money punch cause that will be the end of his night.

that was also the reason why floyd dominated shane

**ModernTalking** · 05-02-2011, 10:56 AM

Pacquiao: Fighter Of The Decade

Mayweather: Not Fighter Of The Decade

**Carpe Diem** · 05-02-2011, 10:57 AM

I don't think Shane will tag Super Wapakman like the way he did Floyd. SW will have to be off balance for Mosley to catch him coming in and out. But make no mistake(If there will be any CompuBox stats for that fight), SW is going to eat more than 92 punches in that fight.

**Code Red** · 05-02-2011, 10:57 AM

Originally posted by lfc19titles

everyone knows may has a better defence but what it will also show how pacs attacking ability is far suprerior which is what has mayweather shooooook

Is it superior or just more entertaining? Floyd has the highest connect percentage of any fighter in history, he also gets hit less than any fighter in history. Pac despite his success gambles on offense and it would onky take a fighter who can counyer and "pull the trigger" effectively to stop him. Pac's offense didnt look so superior vs Marquez....Floyds did.

**Saddlebred** · 05-02-2011, 10:58 AM

Originally posted by brick wall

that was also the reason why floyd dominated shane

they aren't necessarily better/worse but just vastly different types of boxers...which is exactly why everyone wants to see them fight! Floyd would probably be the favorite, but all this **** by *****s and *******s would be put to rest if either of those two cowards would put the petty **** aside and get in the ring for the largest payday in boxing history!

**Clyde Barrow** · 05-02-2011, 10:59 AM

Actually, this fight won't prove a damn thing. Either of them beating Mosley has nothing to do with determining who's better between the 2 of them.

**Code Red** · 05-02-2011, 11:00 AM

Originally posted by brick wall

that was also the reason why floyd dominated shane

Not, Floyd adjusted to his attack and didnt let Mosley catch him with the same punch again, using....defense......I doubt Pac can do that cause he has no D

**lfc19titles** · 05-02-2011, 11:02 AM

Originally posted by Code Red

Is it superior or just more entertaining? Floyd has the highest connect percentage of any fighter in history, he also gets hit less than any fighter in history. Pac despite his success gambles on offense and it would onky take a fighter who can counyer and "pull the trigger" effectively to stop him. Pac's offense didnt look so superior vs Marquez....Floyds did.

its superior mate, pac fought jmm as a lightweight while floyd fought him as a ww which makes a big difference

you will see on saturday why it is superior, all though you should know already

This Fight Will Prove Pacquiao is NOT Better Than Mayweather