Tweet
Originally posted by jltsmae
View Post
-
Why should I be ok with a cheater? I think that the sport of boxing should reverse Mosley's win over De La Hoya in the rematch. I don't know if Pac is using PEDS but he is doing a great impression of a guilty person. -
But you are okay with Floyd fighting an admitted ped user Shane and EVEN make it a BIG WIN for Floyd. Thus, you have no problem with cheaters then...Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostComment
-
Ummmmmm........ Shane was clean for that fight. YOU ARE THE ONE that said Floyd win over a clean Shane don't count. So basically you are saying that it is better to roid up to get props.Originally posted by jltsmae View PostComment
-
you don't get it aren't you? a great fighter/ possiblly roided Shane is not equal to a NO ROID, NOBODY, EASILY GASSED OUT Shane that Floyd fought last year. Thus, Floyd's win over a no roid Shane means nothing. Is it really hard to comprehend?Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostLast edited by jltsmae; 04-29-2011, 08:25 AM.Comment
-
by the way, as there will be no USADA involves comes May 7, doest it mean that you will not watch/ don't even care about the Pac - Shane fight?Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostComment
-
Simple question to all *****s... If based on what you see Floyd would kill Pac, which means the Pac you guys think that is on PEDs why do you need EXTRA test???? Why not fight under the same testing policy from 1958 to present? Why not fight under the same testing policy that Gay-Boy did for the first 40 fights of his career???? Common sense, if you think based on what you see you would thrash Pacquiao, why not just beat him and collect $50mil and pay your tax debts and prevent more repos and liens??? It just doesn't make sense....Comment
-
Originally posted by jltsmae View Post
That's bull****. A win over someone that is clean is better than a win over a cheat. How can you discredit a win in a clean fight? Basically you are supporting Manny Pacquiao not taking the tests. So if Pac does take the tests, comes out clean and gets beat by Floyd. You will not give credit to Floyd because Pac was not able to possibly roid up and was weakened by the blood tests? Fact of the matter is that Floyd took the tests too, so BOTH fighters were clean. It was even. And this Shane was gassed thing is ridiculous because after the 2nd round, Shane couldn't even get no punches off so how could he be tired? I'm supposed to believe that Shane never got any rest after the 2nd round? So many excuses on Floyd/Shane. Dude could of had a lung from Jackie Joyner Kersey and still would have lost because Floyd skill set was too much for Shane. He didn't have to chase Mayweather Jr in that fight. So according to you, now that Pac is fighting a "possibly roided Shane". He gets more props than Floyd for beating him? We always have civil debates and I appreciate it but you have a lame argument.Last edited by GRUSTLER; 04-29-2011, 08:43 AM.Comment
-
I hope he busts a Shane and gets in the ring to challenge Pac! The same *****s that were hatin' on Shane for doing that will praise Floyd for doing the same exact thing. Personally, I don't think Floyd got the balls to do it...we'll seeComment
-
-
Comment