Comments Thread For: Ward vs Abraham is in Jeopardy of Being Called Off

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • leemoorcroft
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 711
    • 34
    • 0
    • 6,799

    #11
    hope this one happens ward is a class act like but AA gota great punch and if he lands then reckon could be all over ward wont get past him and froch without hittin the canvas tell ya this now

    Comment

    • TouchyAndalou
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jul 2010
      • 692
      • 46
      • 4
      • 9,035

      #12
      Originally posted by leemoorcroft
      hope this one happens ward is a class act like but AA gota great punch and if he lands then reckon could be all over ward wont get past him and froch without hittin the canvas tell ya this now
      Neither of these guys are quick enough to put Ward on the canvas, I don't think. Maybe Abraham who is fairly explosive, but I doubt it.

      Comment

      • LeadUppercut
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 13387
        • 305
        • 869
        • 13,720

        #13
        Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP
        The Super Six World Boxing Classic semi-final clash between WBA Super-Middleweight Champion Andre Ward and former tournament point leader King Arthur Abraham will be called off – if the Californian Boxing Commission refuses to honour an existing agreement over neutral officials.

        [Click Here To Read More]
        That suxx, why would the Cali commission do that ?

        I can understand if this was initially an oversight, but once the issue was highlighted by Sauerland it should have been sorted.

        Aside from being fair, the choice of officials was already agreed upon.

        The Super-6 doesn't need rubbish like this heading into the finals.

        Ward doesn't need the " help ", and he doesn't need this hanging over him.

        Pull your head in Cali commission, lets get it on

        Comment

        • bojangles1987
          bo jungle
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2009
          • 41118
          • 1,326
          • 357
          • 63,028

          #14
          What. The. F***.

          Comment

          • UglyPug
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jun 2010
            • 9561
            • 403
            • 159
            • 13,951

            #15
            California should honor the agreement- even if there was no precedent or agreement officially in the contract, i don't see why they wouldn't encourage a neutral ref - get one from south america, asia, or australia. this is going to be a huge disappointment if this fight doesn't go down - time to get to the final of this tournament and finish history.

            Comment

            • UglyPug
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2010
              • 9561
              • 403
              • 159
              • 13,951

              #16
              Originally posted by bojangles1987
              What. The. F***.
              lol you updated your triangle theory - nice.

              Comment

              • LeadUppercut
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2010
                • 13387
                • 305
                • 869
                • 13,720

                #17
                Originally posted by he3r0
                Adds more fuel to the growing notion that Ward is being protected.
                Maybe, but I doubt even German judges could sell a AA decision in that fight.

                Ward by a landslide, or Abe get's " lucky ".

                Only the ref will be a factor in that fight.

                Comment

                • LeadUppercut
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 13387
                  • 305
                  • 869
                  • 13,720

                  #18
                  Originally posted by BattlingNelson
                  This is disgraceful. Of course there should be neutral officials and everybody in the industry knows that Sauerland wont send in another fighter with hometown officials.

                  Since there already has been an agreement (according to Sauerland), why is this even an issue???

                  co-sign...

                  Comment

                  • LeadUppercut
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 13387
                    • 305
                    • 869
                    • 13,720

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Joe2608
                    Unfair for Abraham, he has every right to demand neutral officials and judges. It's also ridiculous that Ward is allowd to have every fight in his own backyard. Having said that i don't think it will change the result of the fight.
                    It is unlikely to have any real bearing on the fight at all, so I think that the "protected" allegations could be a little knee-jerk, let's wait and see, this should get sorted.

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #20
                      Hey but the judges are from Carson, not Oakland which makes them nuetral or even favour Abraham

                      At least thats what some fat yanks on here told me....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP