Who has the better resume Sugar Ray Leonard or Manny Pacquiao?

[STREET CLEANER]

Leonard has victories over Benitez, Hearns, Duran and Hagler.

Pac has victories over Marquez, Barrera, Morales and Cotto.

I would have to give it to the Sugar man.

[HeadShots]

Pacman for overall longevity and accomplishments.


it's not all about names. Pac has more hall of famers on his resume too.

[GrandpaBernard]

Still Ray

manny was conquered by 2 of his 3 rivals

and wasn’t the best fighter of his era

[champion4ever]

People will have to be honest and ask themselves out of what sRL and pac has done whos achievements makes you go wow more.
Is it SRL win over hagler, duran, Benitez and hearns more wow to you or all of pacs achievements which is far too long to even go into detail, I think it's quite clear it's Pac

Well one can make a strong argument or case for either fighter. Leonard fought a total of five HOFers on his resume like: Benitez, Duran, Hearns, Hagler and Camacho. With two of them being against all-time greats in Roberto Duran and Marvin Hagler.

Duran was not only an all-time great lightweight but likewise and all-time P4P great as well. While Hagler was an all-time great Middleweight. Now as far Pac is concerned; He has fought a total of eight HOFers on his resume like: Barrera, Marquez, Morales, De La Hoya, Cotto, Mosley, Bradley and Mayweather.

With one being arguably an all-time great in Floyd Mayweather, Jr. In addition, he has had a total of 72 prizefights; Which nearly doubles that of Leonard's who had only 40 prizefights.

[GhostofDempsey]

Pacquiao for longevity, durability and quality of opposition throughout his entire career and winning titles in 8 weight classes. Wins over Barrera 2x, Morales 2x, JMM 2x (should have been three), Bradley 2x (should have been three), Oscar, Cotto, Margarito, Hatton, Broner and Thurman...all while being the naturally smaller fighter and fighting twice as many pro fights. Leonard's greatest wins were Hearns and Benitez. He defeated an ill-prepared Duran in the rematch on short notice, and got a controversial decision over Hagler and controversial draw in the Hearns rematch which he should have lost. He beat a weight-rained LaLonde. No disrespect towards Leonard, he was a great fighter and beat some great opponents and an Olympic gold medalist, but he rarely put himself at a disadvantage while having the media and networks on his side.

[BodyBagz]

You forgot cotto that little pacquiao destroyed and then mayweather fought him in a very competitive fight.

If you consider Cotto a giant !!!!

Pac the lionheart refused to pay it back to Cotto with a clause free rematch !!!

[BodyBagz]

of course you will say that they are all shot but mayweather was given a GIFT WIN against a shot dela hoya and a shot mosley who almost knock him out a shot margarito that mayweather duck.

Bruh....you're sad.

[EmpiresBoxing]

If you consider Cotto a giant !!!!

Pac the lionheart refused to pay it back to Cotto with a clause free rematch !!!

Yeah i think he's considered a giant compared to a lightweight in size pacquiao. It was a super one sided beatdown that pacquiao won by tko it's not worthy for a rematch. i say there should be a rematch between cotto and mayweather because it was a super close fight.

[EmpiresBoxing]

Bruh....you're sad.

I know it's sad that the boxer you downgrade that pacquiao destroyed was also fought by mayweather but in a very competitive fight and evey boxing fans know that he duck margartio.

[BodyBagz]

I know

man-yawn.gif
............