Who fought more of a 'shot' fighter. De La Hoya or Pacquiao?

**TheGreatA** · 04-23-2011, 09:07 AM

Whitaker was still a capable fighter when De La Hoya beat him, and it was a close decision. Oscar was completely shot when he fought Pacquiao.

**Doctor_Tenma** · 04-23-2011, 09:12 AM

Even the Whitaker that fought Tito had a lot more left in him, not even close really.

**IronDanHamza** · 04-23-2011, 09:21 AM

Whitaker although faded was still capable of beating top fighters.

Oscar, just wasn't.

That doesnt change the fact Pac's 10x greater than Oscar, though.

**Pullcounter** · 04-23-2011, 09:31 AM

Originally posted by Ishy Aytan

Was Pernell Whittaker more shot when Oscar fought him or was Oscar more shot when Pacquiao fought him?

Discuss

whitaker got robbed by Oscar.

**Ishy Aytan** · 04-23-2011, 09:33 AM

Originally posted by Pullcounter

whitaker got robbed by Oscar.

It was a close fight. So do people tend to agree that the Whittaker, Oscar fought was still a live fighter?

Oscar tends to get zero credit for winning that fight.

**Doctor_Tenma** · 04-23-2011, 09:35 AM

Originally posted by Ishy Aytan

It was a close fight. So do people tend to agree that the Whittaker, Oscar fought was still a live fighter?

Oscar tends to get zero credit for winning that fight.

Besides Mayweather and Pacquiao, he'd beat everyone else at 147 right now. Though that isn't saying much to be honest.

**-Huey-** · 04-23-2011, 10:45 AM

Originally posted by Pullcounter

whitaker got robbed by Oscar.

How?? Running around the ring, dancing, and clinching dont win you fights...Oscar threw a lot of punches and all Whittaker did was run and block the whole fight...robbery my ass!

**Luilun** · 04-23-2011, 11:25 AM

Dude You need to put Mayweather namme instead he's like the champion boxer in fighting senior citizen boxers or little guys who call him out.

**johncods** · 04-23-2011, 11:42 AM

Even a 60 year old Whitaker is better than fishnet's so who gives a ****?

Who fought more of a 'shot' fighter. De La Hoya or Pacquiao?