Berto slick, since when?
"Andre Berto is a slick African American fighter who Manny is ducking"
Collapse
-
-
What does him being undefeated have to do with anything?I was 1 of those that said it should be Berto across the ring from Pacman & not Mosley.But chingas seems to want to make it sound like that means that ur picking Berto over Pacman.That wasn't my reasoning(speaking for myself alone).But berto was young prime & undefeated.An easy night for Pacman,sure,but it would erase any doubts that Pacman doesn't fight young,prime black fighters.What pacman passed on,Ortiz took for himself & he deserved it.
Gimme a guy like Barrera, who may have a loss here or there due to challenging himself, over a guy like Berto with a fabricated record.Comment
-
This is true and why the Mosley fight sucks. I for one have never said this fight was great, and before there were ever talks of Manny vs Marquez III.....Ive stated that was a pointless fight as well.
Berto, Mosley and Marquez are all **** fights, and for me it's Floyd or Martinez as those are the only opponents for Manny that I'm interested in right now.Comment
-
Typical of U seeing only 1 point.He's young,prime,Black & undefeated.It would have been a better win for Pacman than a 40 year old Mosley who hasn't won a fight in 2 years.Being undefeated is only 1 of the many reasons that Berto wouldhave been a better choice than Mosley.But when a post is solid & U spend so much time sucking a fighter off,U try & find anything to take out of context,thats just lame.Comment
-
Really. I don't like berto becase he is a hypejob. Don't make it seem I am defending pacquaio. What has berto done in his career that he deserve a shot with pac over bradley, and marquez and martinez or even shane. Maybe if berto gave collazo a rematch or even bea fighter with a pulse I would actually give him prop.berto is a paper champion. Its not like I defending the marg and shane fight since I am not buying those two **** fight. But irather watch those two against pacquaio over berto paper champ ass. If you actually seen the berto vs collazo fight you would know why people calls berto a paper champ and feels that shot shane still will beat him. Berto is worst cherry picker than both roach and floyd


why even waste ur time...when ppl wanna think a fighter they like is right, they'll do anything possible and twist whatever necessary to prove it. thats for every fighter who has a big enough fan club. i said it and ill say it again, manny has become what floyd was about 4 or 5 yrs ago.
Berto is a bumLast edited by victorythagr8; 04-17-2011, 08:22 AM.Comment
-
That's what I don't get either.
I say that the only fights that Manny should be taking that mean something are Floyd and Martinez, and somehow that translates into be defending Manny and his fight against Mosley. I have said it a ton in this thread and in the past.......fighting Mosley is a terrible fight, even Marquez III at 147, but somehow people think that saying Berto fight sucks as well = you hyping up Pac vs Mosley and Pac vs Marquez III.Comment
-
OK whatever man.Typical of U seeing only 1 point.He's young,prime,Black & undefeated.It would have been a better win for Pacman than a 40 year old Mosley who hasn't won a fight in 2 years.Being undefeated is only 1 of the many reasons that Berto wouldhave been a better choice than Mosley.But when a post is solid & U spend so much time sucking a fighter off,U try & find anything to take out of context,thats just lame.
TBH Pac gets zero credit from me by beating Berto. Same with Mosley and same with Marquez....as they do nothing for him career wise.
now how is that me sucking off Pacquiao when I'm calling his fight May 7th and this November **** fights.Comment
-
The thing is you don't say this. You would say Berto doesn't deserve to fight manny.Comment
Comment