Originally posted by SpitBalla
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Khan-Bradley Could Have Big Hurdles Over The Money
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by romebyko View PostIMO Khan and Alexander has fought just about the same level of comp,the difference is Khan has beatin every fighter(except his KO loss)convincingly..Bradley earned 50/50,he has dominated just about every fighter he has faced..He is number 1 at Jr WW and he is undefeated..In order for Khan to get that credit he is looking for he must fight Bradley..50/50 is a fair deal..
Comment
-
Originally posted by romebyko View PostIMO Khan and Alexander has fought just about the same level of comp,the difference is Khan has beatin every fighter(except his KO loss)convincingly..Bradley earned 50/50,he has dominated just about every fighter he has faced..He is number 1 at Jr WW and he is undefeated..In order for Khan to get that credit he is looking for he must fight Bradley..50/50 is a fair deal..
Comment
-
let me explain again in slower terms for you spitballa, you think Alexander sucks because you say he looked like crap, what I was saying is if looking like crap in a fight means you suck then 90% of mayweathers opponents suck, because Mayweather makes you look like bad even if your a top boxer. was that easier to comprehend. Alexander overlooked Kotelnik still pulled out the win and was uncomfortable and over matched and not ready for Bradley
Comment
-
Originally posted by J Dubb II 330 View PostI'm.not quite sure how you got I was comparing Mayweather to Kotelnik? lol
Kotelnik and Bradley made Alexander look bad, so OBVIOUSLY by extention you are comparing Kotelnik and Bradley to Mayweather.
Which is insanely ******, but at the sametime sums up the idiocy you have been writing this whole time.
Think before you write.
Comment
-
It's a 50/50 fight, what's there to argue about? 50/50 down the line. Two champs face off for the biggest prize in boxing - the undisputed title.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SpitBalla View PostMay makes his opponents look bad, but they're not necessarily bad as you say. And you applied this rationale to Alexander.
Kotelnik and Bradley made Alexander look bad, so OBVIOUSLY by extention you are comparing Kotelnik and Bradley to Mayweather.
Which is insanely ******, but at the sametime sums up the idiocy you have been writing this whole time.
Think before you write.
Comment
-
Originally posted by J Dubb II 330 View Postif we go by spitballas theory that your not good because you look bad in a fight, then 90% of mayweathers opponents ******. But considering Alexander didn't look bad against Bradley, it was a 96-95 fight. maybe Bradley is that good to apply effective pressure and adapt to make Alexander uncomfortable but Alexander still boxed very well was just not ready and over matched
Comment
-
Originally posted by J Dubb II 330 View PostBetter all around boxer. There was a reason he was unified and number 2, when he fought Bradley, aside from that I don't entertain your posts, too biased. you ride englands **** to hard
3 hometown judges.
Comment
-
again Alexander overlooked Kotelnik, made himself look bad, still.pulled out the win, Bradley made him uncomfortable and he was overmatched and not ready and he still.boxed good, just wasn't enough. And Bradley at this stage of his career is on the same track as Mayweather was and he is highly talented and skilled.
Comment
Comment