Comments Thread For: Khan-Bradley Could Have Big Hurdles Over The Money

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • J Dubb II 330
    Call Me Nighthawk
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 1916
    • 89
    • 93
    • 8,461

    #101
    Originally posted by SpitBalla
    Wow, now you're comparing Mayweather to Kotelnik?

    And Alexander didn't look bad against Bradley. EVERYONE in the boxing media RIPPED Alexander for how crap he looked.

    Why did even Alexander admitt to sucking complete ass against Kotelnik? And Kotelnik aint no Mayweather my fat friend.

    Stop with the bull**** mental gymnastics. Alexander looked like dog**** in his last two fights, and he EVEN QUIT claiming he couldn't see out of his eyes, even though it was ***ING OBVIOUS he could see.

    He was out boxed by Kotelnik, and he has no heart. No matter how much horse**** you spew, nothing changes the fact even Kotelnik got the better of him, and that he quite like a pu$$y against Bradley.
    I'm.not quite sure how you got I was comparing Mayweather to Kotelnik? lol

    Comment

    • J Dubb II 330
      Call Me Nighthawk
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 1916
      • 89
      • 93
      • 8,461

      #102
      Originally posted by romebyko
      IMO Khan and Alexander has fought just about the same level of comp,the difference is Khan has beatin every fighter(except his KO loss)convincingly..Bradley earned 50/50,he has dominated just about every fighter he has faced..He is number 1 at Jr WW and he is undefeated..In order for Khan to get that credit he is looking for he must fight Bradley..50/50 is a fair deal..
      very true, I wanna see the fight, just got a feeling Khan is going to do what you said Berto did against Mosley lol

      Comment

      • choelzle
        Contender
        • Apr 2010
        • 216
        • 13
        • 21
        • 6,289

        #103
        Originally posted by romebyko
        IMO Khan and Alexander has fought just about the same level of comp,the difference is Khan has beatin every fighter(except his KO loss)convincingly..Bradley earned 50/50,he has dominated just about every fighter he has faced..He is number 1 at Jr WW and he is undefeated..In order for Khan to get that credit he is looking for he must fight Bradley..50/50 is a fair deal..
        I'll say it again maybe everyone will understand me better this time....Alexander has fought the absolute very best fighter in the division and Khan has fought guys who aren't nearly as good ...understand? im not arguing im telling you a fact.

        Comment

        • J Dubb II 330
          Call Me Nighthawk
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 1916
          • 89
          • 93
          • 8,461

          #104
          let me explain again in slower terms for you spitballa, you think Alexander sucks because you say he looked like crap, what I was saying is if looking like crap in a fight means you suck then 90% of mayweathers opponents suck, because Mayweather makes you look like bad even if your a top boxer. was that easier to comprehend. Alexander overlooked Kotelnik still pulled out the win and was uncomfortable and over matched and not ready for Bradley

          Comment

          • SpitBalla
            Banned
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Feb 2011
            • 840
            • 46
            • 0
            • 951

            #105
            Originally posted by J Dubb II 330
            I'm.not quite sure how you got I was comparing Mayweather to Kotelnik? lol
            May makes his opponents look bad, but they're not necessarily bad as you say. And you applied this rationale to Alexander.

            Kotelnik and Bradley made Alexander look bad, so OBVIOUSLY by extention you are comparing Kotelnik and Bradley to Mayweather.

            Which is insanely ******, but at the sametime sums up the idiocy you have been writing this whole time.

            Think before you write.

            Comment

            • Drunk Punch
              In Asia
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2006
              • 5823
              • 172
              • 130
              • 12,619

              #106
              It's a 50/50 fight, what's there to argue about? 50/50 down the line. Two champs face off for the biggest prize in boxing - the undisputed title.

              Comment

              • J Dubb II 330
                Call Me Nighthawk
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 1916
                • 89
                • 93
                • 8,461

                #107
                Originally posted by SpitBalla
                May makes his opponents look bad, but they're not necessarily bad as you say. And you applied this rationale to Alexander.

                Kotelnik and Bradley made Alexander look bad, so OBVIOUSLY by extention you are comparing Kotelnik and Bradley to Mayweather.

                Which is insanely ******, but at the sametime sums up the idiocy you have been writing this whole time.

                Think before you write.
                once again no I'm not Jesus Christ dude, lol your special.

                Comment

                • Rome-By-Ko
                  The winner Is
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 20157
                  • 323
                  • 332
                  • 29,833

                  #108
                  Originally posted by J Dubb II 330
                  if we go by spitballas theory that your not good because you look bad in a fight, then 90% of mayweathers opponents ******. But considering Alexander didn't look bad against Bradley, it was a 96-95 fight. maybe Bradley is that good to apply effective pressure and adapt to make Alexander uncomfortable but Alexander still boxed very well was just not ready and over matched
                  I can't agree(I know big surprise lol)with ya here bro,Bradley made Devon look like he was totally out of his league..With all the clinching and holding and ineffective punches..IMO Khan and Alexander have very similar styles,Khan is just a more committed and slightly more talented then Devon..

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #109
                    Originally posted by J Dubb II 330
                    Better all around boxer. There was a reason he was unified and number 2, when he fought Bradley, aside from that I don't entertain your posts, too biased. you ride englands **** to hard
                    Yeah there was a reason he was unified and number 2 when he fought Bradley.

                    3 hometown judges.

                    Comment

                    • J Dubb II 330
                      Call Me Nighthawk
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 1916
                      • 89
                      • 93
                      • 8,461

                      #110
                      again Alexander overlooked Kotelnik, made himself look bad, still.pulled out the win, Bradley made him uncomfortable and he was overmatched and not ready and he still.boxed good, just wasn't enough. And Bradley at this stage of his career is on the same track as Mayweather was and he is highly talented and skilled.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP