Comments Thread For: Khan vs McCloskey Moved From PPV To Sky Sports 3

[Trigg]

Good! PPV should be for special, unmissable events only.

This is Sky and Rupert Murdoch we're talking about here

The cheeky bastards would try and sell rice to the Chinese

[Ray*]

Great news, The days of exploiting fans should be over, Even Hatton had to play up his image to sell PPV and Tean Khan bringing him in shows how desperate they were in cashing in on a fight that shouldnt be on PPV in the first place.

[Sparked_1985]

It isn't a PPV fight to be fair.

If DeGale vs Groves 02 bill never was, then it would be a PPV. With Clev/Braemer as well.

Khan is a prohibitive favorite. It's not so interesting of a fight because we don't know how good McCloskey is.

[southpaw_07]

its a huge british match up, the main event, but for the rest of the card, seems they match up monkeys against each other. But I dont blame Team khan for being disappointed, I mean even Adamek vs McBride is promoted as PPV

[hvirk]

HELLLLLLLLLLL YEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAHHHHHHH

great i don't have to search for an6 illegal stream for 1/2 prior to the fight!!!!

they'll make us pay for Bradley though, might be a good result for the punters if duddey pulls the upset - cos that unification would be a freebie too!!!!


yeeesss!!!!

[Chrismart]

Should never have been a PPV in the first place to be honest. Top fights with good under-cards and then thats ok, otherwise they should be on a regular sports channel.

[FeFist]

Good. Promoters shouldn't get away with **** cards. The undercard was ****.

Now I can watch this fight on my big screen instead of a ****ty stream. .

You would stream your hero's fight? That's pretty cheap.