Julio Cesar Chavez Jr.: I will KO Saul Alvarez

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CumulousClouds
    HardKnocksOpenToughLocks
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Dec 2010
    • 449
    • 40
    • 41
    • 6,985

    #11
    Originally posted by pullcounter
    it would be an even fight... To hype jobs going at it
    ^^^^^


    lol!

    Comment

    • FerdinandMarcos
      Banned
      • Oct 2010
      • 2110
      • 72
      • 0
      • 2,223

      #12
      Originally posted by *Khan
      Alvarez would destroy him. I like JCC Jr. but Alvarez is too good. He is obviously jealous that Canelo has won over the Mexican people unlike he has been able to do.
      That would be a good fight..they are both evenly matched.

      Comment

      • $Bullsfam$
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 10253
        • 813
        • 630
        • 46,956

        #13
        Originally posted by Mayweather41-0
        Julio Cesar Chavez Jr.: I will KO Saul Alvarez

        Comment

        • Mojita
          U.S. Marine
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 2489
          • 87
          • 26
          • 9,549

          #14
          Originally posted by Fighting Pride
          Both hypejobs, but atleast JCC Jr is fighting a legit middle for his belt. And he doesn't need to be fighting, with his name he could find a much easier occupation and make alot of money. People need to respect him as a true fighter. I'd like to see this fight and would be rooting for JCC Jr. He seems to be the only one keen on the fight while Golden Boy and Canelo seem only concerned with finding stiff after stiff to fight and build a name off.
          Canelos stiffs are way better opposition then Chavez stiffs. Chavezs best win is Duddy...

          Comment

          • Turok2
            Banned
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Mar 2011
            • 701
            • 48
            • 28
            • 952

            #15
            agreed......^^^

            although both have potential to be atg's...they are still very young

            Comment

            • FerdinandMarcos
              Banned
              • Oct 2010
              • 2110
              • 72
              • 0
              • 2,223

              #16
              Originally posted by TuR'oK
              agreed......^^^

              although both have potential to be atg's...they are still very young
              ATG's????

              LOL

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP