Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Which one is more difficult to accomplish to be a multiple or unified division champ?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Which one is more difficult to accomplish to be a multiple or unified division champ?

    Which one is more diffucult to accomplish/achieve in boxing and have more credit? To be a multiple champ in 3 or more different weight divisions or unifying all the belts in one division?

  • #2
    Really equally is both. True dominance and cleaning out a division is just as good winning lineal(emphasis on lineal) titles in multiple divisions.


    Sometimes though, you have to go case by case. But, for different guys it would be just a matter of preference.

    I hold both equally as impressive.

    Comment


    • #3
      Depends who your promoter is.

      With a lot of politics I would say unified.

      With skill I would say multi-division.

      Comment


      • #4
        It depends

        If you have a division like the current HW division, it would be better to move up then become unified there.

        For example RJJ fighting upcoming guys and contenders and also Hopkins MW reign. In those cases id rather they went up to fight

        Comment


        • #5
          there are more unifed champions than multiple div champs..........there goes my answer....

          Comment


          • #6
            easier to move up and win 1 belt in different divisions
            all champs not anxious to risk their belt to unify
            especially guys with belts who aren't big names
            and sanctioning bodies don't always like unification fights either

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
              Really equally is both. True dominance and cleaning out a division is just as good winning lineal(emphasis on lineal) titles in multiple divisions.


              Sometimes though, you have to go case by case. But, for different guys it would be just a matter of preference.

              I hold both equally as impressive.
              I think the significant of both achievement not too far away. I'm leaning towards a bit to the multiple champ in level of difficulties but then on case by case. There some unified champ in boxing history when they moved up they loss or struggle and move back down to their righfully division.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by straightleft View Post
                Which one is more diffucult to accomplish/achieve in boxing and have more credit? To be a multiple champ in 3 or more different weight divisions or unifying all the belts in one division?
                Unified division is much harder. There are way too many belts and too much politics to make it happen. Lack of a unified sanction body for all boxing is one of the problem.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Unifying is much much harder. Manny has proven that you can beat guys off losses at catchweights and become muti-division champ. To unify you actually have to beat good ranked fighters.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Unifying titles i will say. Its almost impossible to have these fights to happen because of these big promoters controlling the industry.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP