Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

better resume..hopkins,pacman

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
    Pac's biggest wins came against bigger men? So beating Margarito and Cotto at catchweights were better than his wins against Barrera, Morales and Marquez?

    Okay.


    History won't remember couple lbs of catchweights. Leonard fought at catchweights nobody tears him up for it. the fact is he won titles while moving up and that is what history looks at.

    Bernard beat dudes that were smaller. it's not impressive. does Tyson get a lot of credit for beating Spinks? or does Ezzard Charles get more credit for beating Joe Louis?


    do you have a brain? i don't think so.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
      I scored Hops-Calz 114-113 Hops and he schooled Pascal imo.

      But still the Glenn Johnson was a great win.
      your scorecard doesnt matter homie..we talking official scores..not fantasy wins

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by LarryX2011 View Post
        your scorecard doesnt matter homie..we talking official scores..not fantasy wins
        Umm yeah. And my vote was still Hopkins.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
          Trinidad was a Middleweight, how was he small. And Hopkins was underdog, every one saying Trinidad was gonna knock him out.

          Pavlik wanted to go up in weight, Hopkins didn't force him. Hopkins was underdog in that fight too.
          now you sound just like a woman.

          everybody said this and that. bernard didn't force him(what kind of ****less emotional logic is that? who gets forced these days?)


          The fact is Bernard beat Trinidad and Pavlik moving up. Just as impressive as Klitschko smashing Byrd or Tyson smashing Spinks. Only Bernard goes 12 rounds with them instead.
          Last edited by Rassclot; 04-03-2011, 09:51 PM.

          Comment


          • #25
            dbl post. bumbaclot
            Last edited by Rassclot; 04-03-2011, 09:56 PM.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
              Umm yeah. And my vote was still Hopkins.
              thats cool..but dont try to make up wins man..he didnt beat joe or pascal..thats all im saying..if you voted b-hop thats fine..

              Comment


              • #27
                man please!!!!...B.Hop's wins over Tito, Tarver and Pavlik(ALL 3 had beaten EVERY man they EVER faced when B.Hop fought them) trumps Manny's wins over old ass Barrera, Morales, and ...who else is worth mentioning?....Manny's L's look childish compared to B.Hop's....B.Hop has NEVER lost a fight to fighter with a L on his record....NEVER....B.Hop was 40 ****in years old and gave a young strong unbeaten, CONFIDENT JT a shot at the MW crown....after B.Hop turned 40 he fought 5 consecutive fights against 5 former or current(at that time) UNDISPUTED champions....JT(was unbeaten)....Tarver(reversed ALL his L's with rematches so he beat every man he ever faced)....Winky(hadn't lost a fight in almost a decade at that time)...Joe Calzaghe(p4p #2, unbeaten) and Pavlik(unbeaten)....Barrera, Morales, Hatton, Cotto, and Marg were already battle bitten by the time Manny gave them work...c'mon man, I don't even wanna drop a essay about this.....B.Hop is the man right now when it comes to comparing ALL the active fighters in the game atm.....call it bias or whatever you want...but B.Hop's OVERALL resume is much better than Manny's...and as some other poster said(but he got it twisted)....it aint even close!!!...WHAT!!!

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by SekondzOut View Post
                  man please!!!!...B.Hop's wins over Tito, Tarver and Pavlik(ALL 3 had beaten EVERY man they EVER faced when B.Hop fought them) trumps Manny's wins over old ass Barrera, Morales, and ...who else is worth mentioning?....Manny's L's look childish compared to B.Hop's....B.Hop has NEVER lost a fight to fighter with a L on his record....NEVER....B.Hop was 40 ****in years old and gave a young strong unbeaten, CONFIDENT JT a shot at the MW crown....after B.Hop turned 40 he fought 5 consecutive fights against 5 former or current(at that time) UNDISPUTED champions....JT(was unbeaten)....Tarver(reversed ALL his L's with rematches so he beat every man he ever faced)....Winky(hadn't lost a fight in almost a decade at that time)...Joe Calzaghe(p4p #2, unbeaten) and Pavlik(unbeaten)....Barrera, Morales, Hatton, Cotto, and Marg were already battle bitten by the time Manny gave them work...c'mon man, I don't even wanna drop a essay about this.....B.Hop is the man right now when it comes to comparing ALL the active fighters in the game atm.....call it bias or whatever you want...but B.Hop's OVERALL resume is much better than Manny's...and as some other poster said(but he got it twisted)....it aint even close!!!...WHAT!!!
                  damn this is very true

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
                    Trinidad was a Middleweight, how was he small. And Hopkins was underdog, every one saying Trinidad was gonna knock him out.

                    Pavlik wanted to go up in weight, Hopkins didn't force him. Hopkins was underdog in that fight too.
                    now you sound just like a woman.

                    everybody said this and that. bernard didn't force him(what kind of ****less emotional logic is that? who gets forced these days?)


                    The fact is Bernard beat Trinidad and Pavlik moving up. Just as impressive as Klitschko smashing Byrd or Tyson smashing Spinks. Only Bernard goes 12 rounds with them instead.
                    Last edited by Rassclot; 04-03-2011, 09:50 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by SekondzOut View Post
                      man please!!!!...B.Hop's wins over Tito, Tarver and Pavlik(ALL 3 had beaten EVERY man they EVER faced when B.Hop fought them) trumps Manny's wins over old ass Barrera, Morales, and ...who else is worth mentioning?....Manny's L's look childish compared to B.Hop's....B.Hop has NEVER lost a fight to fighter with a L on his record....NEVER....B.Hop was 40 ****in years old and gave a young strong unbeaten, CONFIDENT JT a shot at the MW crown....after B.Hop turned 40 he fought 5 consecutive fights against 5 former or current(at that time) UNDISPUTED champions....JT(was unbeaten)....Tarver(reversed ALL his L's with rematches so he beat every man he ever faced)....Winky(hadn't lost a fight in almost a decade at that time)...Joe Calzaghe(p4p #2, unbeaten) and Pavlik(unbeaten)....Barrera, Morales, Hatton, Cotto, and Marg were already battle bitten by the time Manny gave them work...c'mon man, I don't even wanna drop a essay about this.....B.Hop is the man right now when it comes to comparing ALL the active fighters in the game atm.....call it bias or whatever you want...but B.Hop's OVERALL resume is much better than Manny's...and as some other poster said(but he got it twisted)....it aint even close!!!...WHAT!!!
                      All i see is a woman PMSing. now let's cut to the real ****.

                      so Bhop beat smaller men coming up while Pac beat bigger men while moving up.


                      Pac > Bhop

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP