History won't remember couple lbs of catchweights. Leonard fought at catchweights nobody tears him up for it. the fact is he won titles while moving up and that is what history looks at.
Bernard beat dudes that were smaller. it's not impressive. does Tyson get a lot of credit for beating Spinks? or does Ezzard Charles get more credit for beating Joe Louis?
do you have a brain? i don't think so.
...who else is worth mentioning?....Manny's L's look childish compared to B.Hop's....B.Hop has NEVER lost a fight to fighter with a L on his record....NEVER....B.Hop was 40 ****in years old and gave a young strong unbeaten, CONFIDENT JT a shot at the MW crown....after B.Hop turned 40 he fought 5 consecutive fights against 5 former or current(at that time) UNDISPUTED champions....JT(was unbeaten)....Tarver(reversed ALL his L's with rematches so he beat every man he ever faced)....Winky(hadn't lost a fight in almost a decade at that time)...Joe Calzaghe(p4p #2, unbeaten) and Pavlik(unbeaten)....Barrera, Morales, Hatton, Cotto, and Marg were already battle bitten by the time Manny gave them work...c'mon man, I don't even wanna drop a essay about this.....B.Hop is the man right now when it comes to comparing ALL the active fighters in the game atm.....call it bias or whatever you want...but B.Hop's OVERALL resume is much better than Manny's...and as some other poster said(but he got it twisted)....it aint even close!!!...WHAT!!!
Comment