better resume..hopkins,pacman

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rassclot
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2010
    • 1740
    • 125
    • 0
    • 2,141

    #21
    Originally posted by -Kev-
    Pac's biggest wins came against bigger men? So beating Margarito and Cotto at catchweights were better than his wins against Barrera, Morales and Marquez?

    Okay.


    History won't remember couple lbs of catchweights. Leonard fought at catchweights nobody tears him up for it. the fact is he won titles while moving up and that is what history looks at.

    Bernard beat dudes that were smaller. it's not impressive. does Tyson get a lot of credit for beating Spinks? or does Ezzard Charles get more credit for beating Joe Louis?


    do you have a brain? i don't think so.

    Comment

    • Larry the boss
      EDUCATED
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2011
      • 90798
      • 6,419
      • 4,473
      • 2,500,480

      #22
      Originally posted by No Ceilings
      I scored Hops-Calz 114-113 Hops and he schooled Pascal imo.

      But still the Glenn Johnson was a great win.
      your scorecard doesnt matter homie..we talking official scores..not fantasy wins

      Comment

      • B.U.R.N.E.R
        ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2010
        • 30197
        • 1,346
        • 400
        • 47,475

        #23
        Originally posted by LarryX2011
        your scorecard doesnt matter homie..we talking official scores..not fantasy wins
        Umm yeah. And my vote was still Hopkins.

        Comment

        • Rassclot
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2010
          • 1740
          • 125
          • 0
          • 2,141

          #24
          Originally posted by -Kev-
          Trinidad was a Middleweight, how was he small. And Hopkins was underdog, every one saying Trinidad was gonna knock him out.

          Pavlik wanted to go up in weight, Hopkins didn't force him. Hopkins was underdog in that fight too.
          now you sound just like a woman.

          everybody said this and that. bernard didn't force him(what kind of ****less emotional logic is that? who gets forced these days?)


          The fact is Bernard beat Trinidad and Pavlik moving up. Just as impressive as Klitschko smashing Byrd or Tyson smashing Spinks. Only Bernard goes 12 rounds with them instead.
          Last edited by Rassclot; 04-03-2011, 09:51 PM.

          Comment

          • Rassclot
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2010
            • 1740
            • 125
            • 0
            • 2,141

            #25
            dbl post. bumbaclot
            Last edited by Rassclot; 04-03-2011, 09:56 PM.

            Comment

            • Larry the boss
              EDUCATED
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 90798
              • 6,419
              • 4,473
              • 2,500,480

              #26
              Originally posted by No Ceilings
              Umm yeah. And my vote was still Hopkins.
              thats cool..but dont try to make up wins man..he didnt beat joe or pascal..thats all im saying..if you voted b-hop thats fine..

              Comment

              • Mr. Philadel
                #215Boxing
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 20893
                • 1,071
                • 1,413
                • 35,332

                #27
                man please!!!!...B.Hop's wins over Tito, Tarver and Pavlik(ALL 3 had beaten EVERY man they EVER faced when B.Hop fought them) trumps Manny's wins over old ass Barrera, Morales, and ...who else is worth mentioning?....Manny's L's look childish compared to B.Hop's....B.Hop has NEVER lost a fight to fighter with a L on his record....NEVER....B.Hop was 40 ****in years old and gave a young strong unbeaten, CONFIDENT JT a shot at the MW crown....after B.Hop turned 40 he fought 5 consecutive fights against 5 former or current(at that time) UNDISPUTED champions....JT(was unbeaten)....Tarver(reversed ALL his L's with rematches so he beat every man he ever faced)....Winky(hadn't lost a fight in almost a decade at that time)...Joe Calzaghe(p4p #2, unbeaten) and Pavlik(unbeaten)....Barrera, Morales, Hatton, Cotto, and Marg were already battle bitten by the time Manny gave them work...c'mon man, I don't even wanna drop a essay about this.....B.Hop is the man right now when it comes to comparing ALL the active fighters in the game atm.....call it bias or whatever you want...but B.Hop's OVERALL resume is much better than Manny's...and as some other poster said(but he got it twisted)....it aint even close!!!...WHAT!!!

                Comment

                • Larry the boss
                  EDUCATED
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 90798
                  • 6,419
                  • 4,473
                  • 2,500,480

                  #28
                  Originally posted by SekondzOut
                  man please!!!!...B.Hop's wins over Tito, Tarver and Pavlik(ALL 3 had beaten EVERY man they EVER faced when B.Hop fought them) trumps Manny's wins over old ass Barrera, Morales, and ...who else is worth mentioning?....Manny's L's look childish compared to B.Hop's....B.Hop has NEVER lost a fight to fighter with a L on his record....NEVER....B.Hop was 40 ****in years old and gave a young strong unbeaten, CONFIDENT JT a shot at the MW crown....after B.Hop turned 40 he fought 5 consecutive fights against 5 former or current(at that time) UNDISPUTED champions....JT(was unbeaten)....Tarver(reversed ALL his L's with rematches so he beat every man he ever faced)....Winky(hadn't lost a fight in almost a decade at that time)...Joe Calzaghe(p4p #2, unbeaten) and Pavlik(unbeaten)....Barrera, Morales, Hatton, Cotto, and Marg were already battle bitten by the time Manny gave them work...c'mon man, I don't even wanna drop a essay about this.....B.Hop is the man right now when it comes to comparing ALL the active fighters in the game atm.....call it bias or whatever you want...but B.Hop's OVERALL resume is much better than Manny's...and as some other poster said(but he got it twisted)....it aint even close!!!...WHAT!!!
                  damn this is very true

                  Comment

                  • Rassclot
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2010
                    • 1740
                    • 125
                    • 0
                    • 2,141

                    #29
                    Originally posted by -Kev-
                    Trinidad was a Middleweight, how was he small. And Hopkins was underdog, every one saying Trinidad was gonna knock him out.

                    Pavlik wanted to go up in weight, Hopkins didn't force him. Hopkins was underdog in that fight too.
                    now you sound just like a woman.

                    everybody said this and that. bernard didn't force him(what kind of ****less emotional logic is that? who gets forced these days?)


                    The fact is Bernard beat Trinidad and Pavlik moving up. Just as impressive as Klitschko smashing Byrd or Tyson smashing Spinks. Only Bernard goes 12 rounds with them instead.
                    Last edited by Rassclot; 04-03-2011, 09:50 PM.

                    Comment

                    • Rassclot
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jul 2010
                      • 1740
                      • 125
                      • 0
                      • 2,141

                      #30
                      Originally posted by SekondzOut
                      man please!!!!...B.Hop's wins over Tito, Tarver and Pavlik(ALL 3 had beaten EVERY man they EVER faced when B.Hop fought them) trumps Manny's wins over old ass Barrera, Morales, and ...who else is worth mentioning?....Manny's L's look childish compared to B.Hop's....B.Hop has NEVER lost a fight to fighter with a L on his record....NEVER....B.Hop was 40 ****in years old and gave a young strong unbeaten, CONFIDENT JT a shot at the MW crown....after B.Hop turned 40 he fought 5 consecutive fights against 5 former or current(at that time) UNDISPUTED champions....JT(was unbeaten)....Tarver(reversed ALL his L's with rematches so he beat every man he ever faced)....Winky(hadn't lost a fight in almost a decade at that time)...Joe Calzaghe(p4p #2, unbeaten) and Pavlik(unbeaten)....Barrera, Morales, Hatton, Cotto, and Marg were already battle bitten by the time Manny gave them work...c'mon man, I don't even wanna drop a essay about this.....B.Hop is the man right now when it comes to comparing ALL the active fighters in the game atm.....call it bias or whatever you want...but B.Hop's OVERALL resume is much better than Manny's...and as some other poster said(but he got it twisted)....it aint even close!!!...WHAT!!!
                      All i see is a woman PMSing. now let's cut to the real ****.

                      so Bhop beat smaller men coming up while Pac beat bigger men while moving up.


                      Pac > Bhop

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP