Bernard Hopkins was robbed in the Calzaghe fight ....Proof inside.

[daggum]

Did i hurt your feelings? i always speak my mind, i could give a **** less how you feel about it, but i mis-spoke, what i ment to say was B-Hop was hit by a borderline low blow, and took advantage of it to take a much needed break.

you don't even have your facts straight though. borderline low blow? it was a very low blow. watch the replays. it was like 6 inches below the belt line. yes he took advantage of it but who's fault is that? it's calzaghe fault for throwing the low blow. he's the one who allowed hopkins to take a rest.

[AllEyesOpen]

because hopkins got tired in the last couple rounds that means calzaghe wins the early rounds? how does that work?
was hatton beating mayweather as well?

I never said anything about which rounds were won by who, just answering your claim that workrate is not a criteria for scoring fights,

all the parts where no one is throwing punches are cut out. it's supposed to make it less boring since just circling around doesn't really favor one guy or the other.

See the thing is, your not posting this for entertainment value, but to dispute the outcome, so why leave anything out?

I'm out, actually going to rewatch and score this fight, see if i can see what you see.

[daggum]

this just in: hatton was up big on the scorecards before mayweather caught him with a lucky punch! hatton came forward the entire fight and outworked mayweather. too bad he got caught eh lads?

[Lead Cenobite]

I never said anything about which rounds were won by who, just answering your claim that workrate is not a criteria for scoring fights,




See the thing is, your not posting this for entertainment value, but to dispute the outcome, so why leave anything out?

I'm out, actually going to rewatch and score this fight, see if i can see what you see.

Find me ONE RULE BOOK that says workratre is a scoring criteria for a fight.

JUST ONE.

There are four criteria for scoring a fight:

1. clean punching
2. EFFEECTIVE aggressiveness
3. Ring Generalship
4. Defense

In THAT order. Nowhere do I see "workrate"

Feel free to debate these facts at your convenience.

[AllEyesOpen]

you don't even have your facts straight though. borderline low blow? it was a very low blow. watch the replays. it was like 6 inches below the belt line. yes he took advantage of it but who's fault is that? it's calzaghe fault for throwing the low blow. he's the one who allowed hopkins to take a rest.

See you not agreeing with me, and me not having my facts straight are not the same thing, but like i said before i'm out.

[King Ghidorah]

Find me ONE RULE BOOK that says workratre is a scoring criteria for a fight.

JUST ONE.

There are four criteria for scoring a fight:

1. clean punching
2. EFFEECTIVE aggressiveness
3. Ring Generalship
4. Defense

In THAT order. Nowhere do I see "workrate"

Feel free to debate these facts at your convenience.

Calzaghe nuthugggers are as worst as Pac**** and *****s...

[daggum]

I never said anything about which rounds were won by who, just answering your claim that workrate is not a criteria for scoring fights,




See the thing is, your not posting this for entertainment value, but to dispute the outcome, so why leave anything out?

I'm out, actually going to rewatch and score this fight, see if i can see what you see.

you said workrate made hopkins tired in the later rounds so did you use a time machine and go back and score the earlier rounds for calzaghe based on hopkins getting tired late? you knew hopkins was gonna become tired so you kept giving calzaghe rounds based on what was gonna happen in the future? mcflyyyyyyyyyyyyy!

[Jack Napier]

shitty fight
Hopkins deserved to lose for throwing 5 punches a round
no real "winner" in that fight

[Lead Cenobite]

shitty fight
Hopkins deserved to lose for throwing 5 punches a round
no real "winner" in that fight

Excitement is not a scoring criteria.

"Deserved to" is not a scoring criteria.

[AllEyesOpen]

Find me ONE RULE BOOK that says workratre is a scoring criteria for a fight.

JUST ONE.

There are four criteria for scoring a fight:

1. clean punching
2. EFFEECTIVE aggressiveness
3. Ring Generalship
4. Defense

In THAT order. Nowhere do I see "workrate"

Feel free to debate these facts at your convenience.

Dude, again... I never said it was a criteria for scoring rounds

I said that it wins fights. now your just reaching. and this after i'm actually taking your advice and rewatching this fight. Difference between you and me is that i can look at it objectively, that and i'm not as jumpy.