My predicition for Peter v Little Klit

[vB Martin]

Focusing on the first link, the actual documental evidence quoted there -- the letter of Burstein -- does not contain any mention of Souza's vaseline story. The reporter does append the vaseline story to his commentary on Burstein's letter, but this is not what Burstein or Klichko acually said themselves.

Moreover, at no point in time had the Klichko camp offically claimed that the Souza's vaseline has anything to do with Wlad's demise in the Brewster fight. All of the official Klichko news and letters are archived at www.klichko.com.

You might consider referencing a somewhat less biased source on the issue if you want to be taken seriously.

They would not bring Souza into the attempted lawsuit unless they were trying to imply that he was part of "the conspiracy" to rob him of a victory. The reason they didn't mention it in the letters is that they KNEW it was a lame excuse, and they also knew that Souza would sue the **** out of them and win.

The fact that I was able to site 3 seperate sources on the accusation with a quick search and all you have is their ow official webste sort of speaks volumes, doesn't it?

[Slipx]

Wlad has way to much heart to stay down.

he didnt stay down vs sanders and look what happened.

its like how roy said during golatas last fight with brewster, "Golata will NOT recova from this" lol..once peter connects with one shot wlad will NOT recova from this

[.::|ULTIMATE|::.]

Scenario 1

Wlad wins by late round TKO or Points:
The board will erupt into a battle between people who say that beating the untested Peter proves nothing and the usual gang of Klit nuthuggers with a few new bandwagon jumpers (the same ones who jump on the bandwagon of every fighter who wins a televised fight).
The battle will continue to rage until Castillo v Corrales II when the Klit nuthuggers will be overwhelmed because the bandwagon jumpers have left them outnumbered by finding a new Messiah.

Scenario 2

Peter wins by early round KO
The board will erupt into a three way battle between people who say that beating the glass-jawed Wlad proves nothing, the Peter fans (mostly people who are just praying that someone intersting has finally emerged in the HW division) joined by a few new bandwagon jumpers (the same ones who jump on the bandwagon of every fighter who wins a televised fight) against the usual gang of Klit nuthuggers and the few whacked out Klit apologists (who will claim that the reason Wlad lost is because Don King drugged Manny Pacquiou's socks after Joe Souza filled them with Vaseline and Manny only trained them to go 2 rounds).
The battle will continue to rage until Castillo v Corrales II when the bandwagon jumpers have found a new Messiah and everyone else is too busy dis*****g or defending the outcome of what should be a hellacious fight.

I could be wrong, though

So let me get this straight... What you're saying is... the real fight is October 8th

[Nautilus]

You might consider referencing a somewhat less biased source on the issue if you want to be taken seriously.

They would not bring Souza into the attempted lawsuit unless they were trying to imply that he was part of "the conspiracy" to rob him of a victory. The reason they didn't mention it in the letters is that they KNEW it was a lame excuse, and they also knew that Souza would sue the **** out of them and win.

The fact that I was able to site 3 seperate sources on the accusation with a quick search and all you have is their ow official webste sort of speaks volumes, doesn't it?

Come on, three sources that copy from each other as Beavis and Butthead did on one of their exams... The problem is that they copy an anecdotical evidence, not an actual QUOTE.

Wlad changed the whole support team after the accident, including Souza. That is true.

But I have never seen any single source QUOTING Wlad or Vit saying that vaseline was behind the demise.

Please provide at least one source that actually QUOTES Wlad or Vit on this.

[vB Martin]

I guess all of these people are lying, and only you have the facts in the case:

Yahoo Web Search Results

Google Web Search Results

MSN Web Search Results

[Nautilus]

I guess all of these people are lying, and only you have the facts in the case:

Yahoo Web Search Results

Google Web Search Results

MSN Web Search Results

Focusing on the first set of search result and first five links, none of the articles QUOTE Vitaliy or Wlad. They mention other people say about vaseline, but not Wlad or Vitaliy.

I am not stating that people are lying, but I think that I have never read a single source QUOTING Wlad or Vitaliy about the ****** vaseline story.

[vB Martin]

Because the accusations came out of their camps, not from the fighter himself. Can you find a single quote from Little Klit saying he never said that?

[Nautilus]

Because the accusations came out of their camps, not from the fighter himself. Can you find a single quote from Little Klit saying he never said that?

There is a presumption of innocence. You have to prove that Wlad said something that implicates him, not the other way around.

The artciles cited may provide an indrect evidence, but they lack a quote.

[vB Martin]

There is a presumption of innocence. You have to prove that Wlad said something that implicates him, not the other way around.

The artciles cited may provide an indrect evidence, but they lack a quote.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

lame.

[Slipx]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

lame.

camoflauged thread bump detected.

just let it die. it's a gay thread anyway. do not bump the gayness.