Comments Thread For: Mayweather Jr. is Blasted By The IRS, $3.4 Million Tax Bill

[jltsmae]

wowwwww.. just woowww people are still here....

[SpitBalla]

Hey **** you could right there, hold on man, I'll just go check....

..... ummm, I just looked in the mirror, and I'm not sure ?

Could be

But I tell you what, it's better than being a *******.....



You must be the one at the back

LeadUppercut that is the worst, most idiotic comeback I've ever encountered on the net. Only someone of the IQ of a child or a mentally handicapped idiot would think posting a shamelessly idiotic unfunny picture would qualify as a comeback. Very pathetic.

And what kind of friendless loser racks up over 5000 posts in less than a year? I really wonder what manner of basement dwelling loser hangs out on a forum where hes not even liked.

This pathetic guy even responds to his own posts! How much more pathetic can one get?

But the only thing more pathetic than this poor loser must be this truly unfunny idiotic comeback. You should be ashamed of yourself, but that may not be possible for an unemployed autistic such as yourself.

[LeadUppercut]

Only someone of the IQ of a child or a mentally handicapped idiot would think posting a shamelessly idiotic unfunny picture would qualify as a comeback.

****Balla, if the cap fit's..... wear it

[IMG]http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/Gay*******.jpg[/IMG]

And, I can be way more childish than that

Talk about boxing you idiot, or *** off.....

Miguel Cotto.....

When Pacquiao fought Cotto, Miguel had just been destroyed by Margarito and then battered by Clottey. EVERY reputable trainer/reporter/analyst said that Cotto looked shop-worn and well-faded, and that he had been in too many wars.

Cotto was not on top of his game, he had begun to slide, he had no trainer to speak of, and was struggling with problems both in camp and at home relating to a family matter that affected his relationship with head trainer Evan Cotto.

Miguel was not on top of his game, and he most certainly was not in his prime..... plus, Pacquiao tried to drain him on the scales.

Listen to this reporter's take on the subject, shortly after the Clottey fight....

"I wasn’t exactly shocked to see Manny Pacquiao’s name being linked for a fight with Miguel Cotto after the Puerto Rican fighters disappointing performance last Saturday night against Joshua Clottey. As bad as Cotto looked in the fight, and believe me Cotto looked pretty awful, it seemed like a no brainer that Pacquiao would then select him as his next opponent.

But my question is why isn’t Pacquiao going after Shane Mosley or Paul Williams instead? Why the emphasis at fighting Cotto, when he was destroyed by Antonio Margarito last year? It seems to me the much better choice for Pacquiao would be to go after Mosley, since he beat Margarito a few months ago by a 9th round TKO.

Since Margarito has already stopped Cotto, the logical choice for Pacquiao to fight would be Mosley. That’s the bout that Pacquiao should be going after unless he wants to be considered a cherry picker."

Pacquiao saw that Cotto was ripe, so he jumped on him, but even the fact that Cotto had faded was not enough of an advantage for 27%..... so he demanded a catch-weight of 145lbs.

A catch-weight, for a title fight..... *** me, that is lame.

Cotto of course, flatly refused. Miguel stated "147 if you want my title, but no-title if you need a catchweight". Of course, 27% demanded a catchweight and the title, it became a sticking point to get the fight made, so Cotto was forced to concede.

But even that was not enough for 27%, he demanded 143, even though his trainer Freddie Roach agreed to 144. Luckily for Miguel he stuck to his guns, or those cherry-picking ****s would have dragged him down to 143lbs.....
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/275865

Catch-weights.....

There are only two reasons to demand a catch-weight.....

1.) you are not good enough to compete with your opponent at his natural weight

2.) you are attempting to drain your opponent to gain an unfair advantage

Pacquiao tried to drain Cotto, because Manny had already fought at 147.

The 143lb demand was an absolute joke, they really tried to do a number on Cotto. Just because the bullet missed, does not lessen the intent.

Shame on 27% for cheating history, not once, but twice, because he did the same thing to Margarito..... Emmanuel Steward was correct when he said that Pacquiao is a cherry-picker who does not compare with truly great fighters.

What a lame b1tch that 27% kid turned out to be.

Shane Mosley.....

What can I say, this will be short and sweet..... that cherry-picking pu$$y Manny "padded" Pacquiao ducked Shane Mosley not once, but TWICE !!

Initially Mosley offered to go down to 142-143, then he offered to drop to 140, but still 27% would not front up and fight him.

Until that is, Shane was a year older, and had suffered a loss to Mayweather in which he looked like an old man, and an ugly draw with Sergio Mora.

Now, all of a sudden..... Shane's the man.

Who woulda thought, a boxer gets old and slow, and he strikes the payday.

WTF ?

Notice a pattern emerging ?

Shot.....
Hoya > Hatton > Cotto > Margarito > Shane..... then 40yo Marquez at 150 ?

What a fkn hype-job that 27% kid is.

[inbox]

So, that's it then..... ?

Three good posters replied - Alibata, ProudtobePINOY, Lorily - and they all got their point across pretty well. Admittedly, I should have been more personable with those guys, but hey, this thread has turned into a bit of a war zone

But, that's it? THAT'S ALL YOU GOT ???

What happened to this bunch of ***wits..... ?

SpitBalla - AFighter4U - badass316 - jltsmae - jellybeans - inbox - Ryannn - PAKYO - AeKhuban - ThePrince - lxs - Slick_Rick - Johnny Chingas - | THE - ING | - Deedubbzz07 - NinjaMan!

You fan-boy clowns were content to dribble on about another man's finances for 50+ pages, but when it comes to addressing actual boxing issues regarding Pacquiao, you ******s jumped ship ?

YOU FKN LAME CLOWNS !!

what a sad lil old man you are. smh. we didnt dribble on floyd's finances. we dribbled on your ******ity.

Bro, just tell lxs what the second rule of business is

[STRUGG]

floyd is ******...............end thread

[AFighter4U]

****Balla, if the cap fit's..... wear it

[IMG]http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/Gay*******.jpg[/IMG]

And, I can be way more childish than that

Talk about boxing you idiot, or *** off.....

Miguel Cotto.....

When Pacquiao fought Cotto, Miguel had just been destroyed by Margarito and then battered by Clottey. EVERY reputable trainer/reporter/analyst said that Cotto looked shop-worn and well-faded, and that he had been in too many wars.

Cotto was not on top of his game, he had begun to slide, he had no trainer to speak of, and was struggling with problems both in camp and at home relating to a family matter that affected his relationship with head trainer Evan Cotto.

Miguel was not on top of his game, and he most certainly was not in his prime..... plus, Pacquiao tried to drain him on the scales.

Listen to this reporter's take on the subject, shortly after the Clottey fight....

"I wasn’t exactly shocked to see Manny Pacquiao’s name being linked for a fight with Miguel Cotto after the Puerto Rican fighters disappointing performance last Saturday night against Joshua Clottey. As bad as Cotto looked in the fight, and believe me Cotto looked pretty awful, it seemed like a no brainer that Pacquiao would then select him as his next opponent.

But my question is why isn’t Pacquiao going after Shane Mosley or Paul Williams instead? Why the emphasis at fighting Cotto, when he was destroyed by Antonio Margarito last year? It seems to me the much better choice for Pacquiao would be to go after Mosley, since he beat Margarito a few months ago by a 9th round TKO.

Since Margarito has already stopped Cotto, the logical choice for Pacquiao to fight would be Mosley. That’s the bout that Pacquiao should be going after unless he wants to be considered a cherry picker."

Pacquiao saw that Cotto was ripe, so he jumped on him, but even the fact that Cotto had faded was not enough of an advantage for 27%..... so he demanded a catch-weight of 145lbs.

A catch-weight, for a title fight..... *** me, that is lame.

Cotto of course, flatly refused. Miguel stated "147 if you want my title, but no-title if you need a catchweight". Of course, 27% demanded a catchweight and the title, it became a sticking point to get the fight made, so Cotto was forced to concede.

But even that was not enough for 27%, he demanded 143, even though his trainer Freddie Roach agreed to 144. Luckily for Miguel he stuck to his guns, or those cherry-picking ****s would have dragged him down to 143lbs.....
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/275865

Catch-weights.....

There are only two reasons to demand a catch-weight.....

1.) you are not good enough to compete with your opponent at his natural weight

2.) you are attempting to drain your opponent to gain an unfair advantage

Pacquiao tried to drain Cotto, because Manny had already fought at 147.

The 143lb demand was an absolute joke, they really tried to do a number on Cotto. Just because the bullet missed, does not lessen the intent.

Shame on 27% for cheating history, not once, but twice, because he did the same thing to Margarito..... Emmanuel Steward was correct when he said that Pacquiao is a cherry-picker who does not compare with truly great fighters.

What a lame b1tch that 27% kid turned out to be.

Shane Mosley.....

What can I say, this will be short and sweet..... that cherry-picking pu$$y Manny "padded" Pacquiao ducked Shane Mosley not once, but TWICE !!

Initially Mosley offered to go down to 142-143, then he offered to drop to 140, but still 27% would not front up and fight him.

Until that is, Shane was a year older, and had suffered a loss to Mayweather in which he looked like an old man, and an ugly draw with Sergio Mora.

Now, all of a sudden..... Shane's the man.

Who woulda thought, a boxer gets old and slow, and he strikes the payday.

WTF ?

Notice a pattern emerging ?

Shot.....
Hoya > Hatton > Cotto > Margarito > Shane..... then 40yo Marquez at 150 ?

What a fkn hype-job that 27% kid is.

wow.

butt-hurt much dude?

[JD Salinger]

Bro, just tell lxs what the second rule of business is

... waiting.

[LeadUppercut]

So, that's it then..... ?

THAT'S ALL YOU GOT ??



So, this bunch of ***go7's here.....

SpitBalla - AFighter4U - badass316 - jltsmae - jellybeans - inbox - Ryannn - PAKYO - AeKhuban - ThePrince - lxs - Slick_Rick - Johnny Chingas - | THE - ING | - Deedubbzz07 - NinjaMan!

Has been reduced, to this..... inbox / lxs ?

AND THAT'S ALL YOU GOT ???

LMFAO !!

Two whiney little ***go7's, with less than 300 posts between them, who will log onto a boxing website, but will not actually discuss boxing. Oh yea, Pac must be so proud

Here is why you two whiney ***go7's are both worthless pieces of ****....

I have shredded 27%'s mighty JMW campaign, and I have shredded what is likely to be the "new" and "improved" Pacquiao's two best wins..... and what did you do?

You two ***go7's just sat there crying like little b1tches

Oh yea, 27% must be REAL proud of you two whiney ***go7's, ya really stuck up for Manny and provided articulate factual documentation to prove that Manny is not an over-rated hypejob

LMFAO

***tards, tell me something.....

When is 27% going to grow some balls, stop using PED's, and take the test ?

Hmmm ?

[LeadUppercut]

Part 3.....

Pacquiao's last 8 opponents, and the possible Marquez trilogy.....

On sale at your favorite bookstore real soon

Won't that be a hoot

You two whiney ***go7's will be able to..... ummm.....

..... continue to say nothing

[LeadUppercut]

Come on 27%, man up b1tch and take the test.....

Miguel Cotto.....

When Pacquiao fought Cotto, Miguel had just been destroyed by Margarito and then battered by Clottey. EVERY reputable trainer/reporter/analyst said that Cotto looked shop-worn and well-faded, and that he had been in too many wars.

Cotto was not on top of his game, he had begun to slide, he had no trainer to speak of, and was struggling with problems both in camp and at home relating to a family matter that affected his relationship with head trainer Evan Cotto.

Miguel was not on top of his game, and he most certainly was not in his prime..... plus, Pacquiao tried to drain him on the scales.

Listen to this reporter's take on the subject, shortly after the Clottey fight....

"I wasn’t exactly shocked to see Manny Pacquiao’s name being linked for a fight with Miguel Cotto after the Puerto Rican fighters disappointing performance last Saturday night against Joshua Clottey. As bad as Cotto looked in the fight, and believe me Cotto looked pretty awful, it seemed like a no brainer that Pacquiao would then select him as his next opponent.

But my question is why isn’t Pacquiao going after Shane Mosley or Paul Williams instead? Why the emphasis at fighting Cotto, when he was destroyed by Antonio Margarito last year? It seems to me the much better choice for Pacquiao would be to go after Mosley, since he beat Margarito a few months ago by a 9th round TKO.

Since Margarito has already stopped Cotto, the logical choice for Pacquiao to fight would be Mosley. That’s the bout that Pacquiao should be going after unless he wants to be considered a cherry picker."

Pacquiao saw that Cotto was ripe, so he jumped on him, but even the fact that Cotto had faded was not enough of an advantage for 27%..... so he demanded a catch-weight of 145lbs.

A catch-weight, for a title fight..... *** me, that is lame.

Cotto of course, flatly refused. Miguel stated "147 if you want my title, but no-title if you need a catchweight". Of course, 27% demanded a catchweight and the title, it became a sticking point to get the fight made, so Cotto was forced to concede.

But even that was not enough for 27%, he demanded 143, even though his trainer Freddie Roach agreed to 144. Luckily for Miguel he stuck to his guns, or those cherry-picking ****s would have dragged him down to 143lbs.....
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/275865

Catch-weights.....

There are only two reasons to demand a catch-weight.....

1.) you are not good enough to compete with your opponent at his natural weight

2.) you are attempting to drain your opponent to gain an unfair advantage

Pacquiao tried to drain Cotto, because Manny had already fought at 147.

The 143lb demand was an absolute joke, they really tried to do a number on Cotto. Just because the bullet missed, does not lessen the intent.

Shame on 27% for cheating history, not once, but twice, because he did the same thing to Margarito..... Emmanuel Steward was correct when he said that Pacquiao is a cherry-picker who does not compare with truly great fighters.

What a lame b1tch that 27% kid turned out to be

Shane Mosley.....

What can I say, this will be short and sweet..... that cherry-picking pu$$y Manny "padded" Pacquiao ducked Shane Mosley not once, but TWICE !!

Initially Mosley offered to go down to 142-143, then he offered to drop to 140, but still 27% would not front up and fight him.

Until that is, Shane was a year older, and had suffered a loss to Mayweather in which he looked like an old man, and an ugly draw with Sergio Mora.

Now, all of a sudden..... Shane's the man

Who woulda thought, a boxer gets old and slow, and he strikes the payday.

WTF ?

Notice a pattern emerging ?

Shot.....
Hoya > Hatton > Cotto > Margarito > Shane..... then 40yo Marquez at 150 ?

What a fkn hype-job that 27% kid is.