Comments Thread For: Mayweather Jr. is Blasted By The IRS, $3.4 Million Tax Bill

[LeadUppercut]

just like Floyd, self proclaiming that your the best...lol

Link please..... ?

I said that I kicked your arse, no big deal, because you are a clown

[Ryannn]

Because, you are more interested in other men's financial matters ?

Got life much ?

wtf. i barely even talked about floyd in this thread.

most of it was calling you out on your idiocy.

so yeah, i'd rather call you a ****** 28 times than discuss boxing with you, you mentally challenged ***** head.

[LeadUppercut]

Wait....I'm on your side bro....tell me the second rule of business....please

discuss boxing with you? no thanks.

Still, these two ***go7s will not mention one single thing about boxing.

You two whiney clowns are a joke.

wait...i take all i said back to LeadUppercut....i also want to know the "second rule of business"........so i can be financially free like him and be on boxingscene all day .... ranting about how he hates that Manny is successful....oh mighty one...show us the way......

Hey ****head, reply to this, seeing as dumb and dumber are full of ****.....

Miguel Cotto.....

When Pacquiao fought Cotto, Miguel had just been destroyed by Margarito and then battered by Clottey. EVERY reputable trainer/reporter/analyst said that Cotto looked shop-worn and well-faded, and that he had been in too many wars.

Cotto was not on top of his game, he had begun to slide, he had no trainer to speak of, and was struggling with problems both in camp and at home relating to a family matter that affected his relationship with head trainer Evan Cotto.

Miguel was not on top of his game, and he most certainly was not in his prime..... plus, Pacquiao tried to drain him on the scales.

Listen to this reporter's take on the subject, shortly after the Clottey fight....

"I wasn’t exactly shocked to see Manny Pacquiao’s name being linked for a fight with Miguel Cotto after the Puerto Rican fighters disappointing performance last Saturday night against Joshua Clottey. As bad as Cotto looked in the fight, and believe me Cotto looked pretty awful, it seemed like a no brainer that Pacquiao would then select him as his next opponent.

But my question is why isn’t Pacquiao going after Shane Mosley or Paul Williams instead? Why the emphasis at fighting Cotto, when he was destroyed by Antonio Margarito last year? It seems to me the much better choice for Pacquiao would be to go after Mosley, since he beat Margarito a few months ago by a 9th round TKO.

Since Margarito has already stopped Cotto, the logical choice for Pacquiao to fight would be Mosley. That’s the bout that Pacquiao should be going after unless he wants to be considered a cherry picker."

Pacquiao saw that Cotto was ripe, so he jumped on him, but even the fact that Cotto had faded was not enough of an advantage for 27%..... so he demanded a catch-weight of 145lbs.

A catch-weight, for a title fight..... *** me, that is lame

Cotto of course, flatly refused. Miguel stated "147 if you want my title, but no-title if you need a catchweight". Of course, 27% demanded a catchweight and the title, it became a sticking point to get the fight made, so Cotto was forced to concede.

But even that was not enough for 27%, he demanded 143, even though his trainer Freddie Roach agreed to 144. Luckily for Miguel he stuck to his guns, or those cherry-picking ****s would have dragged him down to 143lbs.....
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/275865

Catch-weights.....

There are only two reasons to demand a catch-weight.....

1.) you are not good enough to compete with your opponent at his natural weight

2.) you are attempting to drain your opponent to gain an unfair advantage

Pacquiao tried to drain Cotto, because Manny had already fought at 147.

The 143lb demand was an absolute joke, they really tried to do a number on Cotto. Just because the bullet missed, does not lessen the intent.

Shame on 27% for cheating history, not once, but twice, because he did the same thing to Margarito..... Emmanuel Steward was correct when he said that Pacquiao is a cherry-picker who does not compare with truly great fighters.

What a lame b1tch that 27% kid turned out to be

Shane Mosley.....

What can I say, this will be short and sweet..... that cherry-picking pu$$y Manny "padded" Pacquiao ducked Shane Mosley not once, but TWICE !!

Initially Mosley offered to go down to 142-143, then he offered to drop to 140, but still 27% would not front up and fight him.

Until that is, Shane was a year older, and had suffered a loss to Mayweather in which he looked like an old man, and an ugly draw with Sergio Mora.

Now, all of a sudden..... Shane's the man

Who woulda thought, a boxer gets old and slow, and he strikes the payday.

WTF ?

Notice a pattern emerging ?

Shot.....
Hoya > Hatton > Cotto > Margarito > Shane..... then 40yo Marquez at 150 ?

What a fkn hype-job that 27% kid is.

[Ryannn]

still copying and pasting the rant you have to divert the issue on how much you are ****ing ****** eh?

i know its early, but i think you deserve this

[LeadUppercut]

still copying and pasting the rant you have to divert the issue on how much you are ****ing ****** eh?

i know its early, but i think you deserve this

You *******s crack me up.....

[IMG]http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/Gay*******.jpg[/IMG]

[inbox]

2nd rule of business will be released tonight.....

Subject: Second Rule of Business

Well, won't that just be a big ball of fun kids

Yay, thanks bro

[Ryannn]

man, i'm still lolling at how much of a pathetic sack of shiiit you are.

[LeadUppercut]

still copying and pasting the rant you have to divert the issue on how much you are ****ing ****** eh?

i know its early, but i think you deserve this

Clown-boy..... talk about boxing or *** off you lame whiney kid

Miguel Cotto.....

When Pacquiao fought Cotto, Miguel had just been destroyed by Margarito and then battered by Clottey. EVERY reputable trainer/reporter/analyst said that Cotto looked shop-worn and well-faded, and that he had been in too many wars.

Cotto was not on top of his game, he had begun to slide, he had no trainer to speak of, and was struggling with problems both in camp and at home relating to a family matter that affected his relationship with head trainer Evan Cotto.

Miguel was not on top of his game, and he most certainly was not in his prime..... plus, Pacquiao tried to drain him on the scales.

Listen to this reporter's take on the subject, shortly after the Clottey fight....

"I wasn’t exactly shocked to see Manny Pacquiao’s name being linked for a fight with Miguel Cotto after the Puerto Rican fighters disappointing performance last Saturday night against Joshua Clottey. As bad as Cotto looked in the fight, and believe me Cotto looked pretty awful, it seemed like a no brainer that Pacquiao would then select him as his next opponent.

But my question is why isn’t Pacquiao going after Shane Mosley or Paul Williams instead? Why the emphasis at fighting Cotto, when he was destroyed by Antonio Margarito last year? It seems to me the much better choice for Pacquiao would be to go after Mosley, since he beat Margarito a few months ago by a 9th round TKO.

Since Margarito has already stopped Cotto, the logical choice for Pacquiao to fight would be Mosley. That’s the bout that Pacquiao should be going after unless he wants to be considered a cherry picker."

Pacquiao saw that Cotto was ripe, so he jumped on him, but even the fact that Cotto had faded was not enough of an advantage for 27%..... so he demanded a catch-weight of 145lbs.

A catch-weight, for a title fight..... *** me, that is lame.

Cotto of course, flatly refused. Miguel stated "147 if you want my title, but no-title if you need a catchweight". Of course, 27% demanded a catchweight and the title, it became a sticking point to get the fight made, so Cotto was forced to concede.

But even that was not enough for 27%, he demanded 143, even though his trainer Freddie Roach agreed to 144. Luckily for Miguel he stuck to his guns, or those cherry-picking ****s would have dragged him down to 143lbs.....
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/275865

Catch-weights.....

There are only two reasons to demand a catch-weight.....

1.) you are not good enough to compete with your opponent at his natural weight

2.) you are attempting to drain your opponent to gain an unfair advantage

Pacquiao tried to drain Cotto, because Manny had already fought at 147.

The 143lb demand was an absolute joke, they really tried to do a number on Cotto. Just because the bullet missed, does not lessen the intent.

Shame on 27% for cheating history, not once, but twice, because he did the same thing to Margarito..... Emmanuel Steward was correct when he said that Pacquiao is a cherry-picker who does not compare with truly great fighters.

What a lame b1tch that 27% kid turned out to be

Shane Mosley.....

What can I say, this will be short and sweet..... that cherry-picking pu$$y Manny "padded" Pacquiao ducked Shane Mosley not once, but TWICE !!

Initially Mosley offered to go down to 142-143, then he offered to drop to 140, but still 27% would not front up and fight him.

Until that is, Shane was a year older, and had suffered a loss to Mayweather in which he looked like an old man, and an ugly draw with Sergio Mora.

Now, all of a sudden..... Shane's the man

Who woulda thought, a boxer gets old and slow, and he strikes the payday.

WTF ?

Notice a pattern emerging ?

Shot.....
Hoya > Hatton > Cotto > Margarito > Shane..... then 40yo Marquez at 150 ?

What a fkn hype-job that 27% kid is.

[Ryannn]

pacquiao hate rants on a floyd tax thread.

[JD Salinger]

So, that's it then..... ?

Three good posters replied - Alibata, ProudtobePINOY, Lorily - and they all got their point across pretty well. Admittedly, I should have been more personable with those guys, but hey, this thread has turned into a bit of a war zone

But, that's it? THAT'S ALL YOU GOT ???

What happened to this bunch of ***wits..... ?

SpitBalla - AFighter4U - badass316 - jltsmae - jellybeans - inbox - Ryannn - PAKYO - AeKhuban - ThePrince - lxs - Slick_Rick - Johnny Chingas - | THE - ING | - Deedubbzz07 - NinjaMan!

You fan-boy clowns were content to dribble on about another man's finances for 50+ pages, but when it comes to addressing actual boxing issues regarding Pacquiao, you ******s jumped ship ?

YOU FKN LAME CLOWNS !!

what a sad lil old man you are. smh. we didnt dribble on floyd's finances. we dribbled on your ******ity.