Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by PBP View Post
    Smh @ boxing fans supporting this buddy buddy we are the world type of bs.

    Pernell Whitaker got robbed, he whooped Ramirez a$$ in the rematch

    Lennox Lewis got robbed, he whooped Holyfield a$$ in the rematch

    But now since Mannys involved it's. "Sorry Manny. Your a legend, an ambassador for tge sport, and a Bible ambassador. You defeated me fair and squate so here is your belts back. Take care and thaks for giving me the opportunity to fight you. Maybe you Jinkee , my wife and i can hang out at Starbucks and hold Bible study together"

    GTFOH. If Pac feels he's the better fighter, fight the full 12 rounds, quit taking 2 minute brwaks during rounds and knock this fool out. Fucc the money. Demand a rematch and destroy this dude.

    Damn boxing getting soft.
    it's the pacfarts that support this type of behavior. they somehow believe that just because manny is "humble" he deserves unfair advantages and special treatment. they just don't understand that boxing is a man's sport.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by loui_ludwig View Post
      I just posted of what i saw when i rewatched the fight. It don't matter if i, the majority of fans, more than 80% of members here, boxers, and 90 something media, have Pac winning. What is done is done. The judges gave it to Bradley and Pac has a L in his record.
      You mean several L's...

      Comment


      • I actually believe Ward saying he would give the belt back if he won a fight in which he got dominated.

        Comment


        • Usually Andre says the right thing but he is way off on this. Terrible decisions are part of the sport and this robbery shouldn't be treated any different. Bradley is a fighter not a judge. He was awarded the victory by two judges and the rules of boxing say he is the winner because of that fact. Manny gets a chance to win his title back in November and it is up to him to not leave it in the judges hands.

          Now if a full investigation is conducted and it is a proven fact that the judges were paid off, then the title must be returned and the judges and Arum should be thrown in jail.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by acidity View Post
            "It was a ridiculous decision. Bradley lost the majority of the rounds. If it was me personally, I would admit defeat and say, 'Here's your belt back.'"

            Andre Ward
            why are you quoting andre ward all of a sudden? what aren't you quoting the top rank official who had it for bradley?

            Comment


            • Popovich, I didn't believe you when you called yourself a Paxtard until you started sayin **** like "Manny will obliterate him in the rematch" and "...this fight will be so lopsided that no one would want to see a third fight" lol. I hope they have a rematch just so Bradley could prove the boxing public wrong, but I really don't think it's gonna go down. I expect Pac vs. Marquez 4 and then the winner fights Bradley. Somebody is gonna be put in front of Pac before the rematch happens.

              Anyways, I think Ward should sit down and STFU with that train of thought, cuz I doubt he would take his own advice. Winning the belt is more than just what happens in the ring, it's a culmination of all the time and effort a fighter puts into getting prepared for the bout, all the blood/sweat/tears. Regardless if the majority doesn't feel he won, Bradley should keep it and defend like any other champion would.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Primera View Post
                why are you quoting andre ward all of a sudden? what aren't you quoting the top rank official who had it for bradley?
                I will quote whoever I want. You do the same.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by immortal tech View Post
                  it wasn't a one sided fight it was a close fight and Manny lost just like Marquez did end of the story
                  Sr. Mayweather
                  J. Mayweather
                  99.99% who watched the fight
                  99.99% of the media
                  They all had Pac winning in one sided decision except the blind floydiots. Well these floydiots have nothing to zero credibility at all so who cares about their ****** trolling. They just proved themselves a ****** beyond belief. On the other side, Marquez vs Pac 3 was close that can go either way. Your poor comparison is ******ed.
                  Last edited by whirlwind; 06-12-2012, 07:48 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by PBP View Post
                    Smh @ boxing fans supporting this buddy buddy we are the world type of bs.

                    Pernell Whitaker got robbed, he whooped Ramirez a$$ in the rematch

                    Lennox Lewis got robbed, he whooped Holyfield a$$ in the rematch

                    But now since Mannys involved it's. "Sorry Manny. Your a legend, an ambassador for the sport, and a Bible ambassador. You defeated me fair and square so here is your belts back. Take care and thanks for giving me the opportunity to fight you. Maybe you Jinkee , my wife and i can hang out at Starbucks and hold Bible study together"

                    GTFOH. If Pac feels he's the better fighter, fight the full 12 rounds, quit taking 2 minute breaks during rounds and knock this fool out. Fucc the money. Demand a rematch and destroy this dude.

                    Damn boxing getting soft.
                    You basically said the same thing I said.

                    This is how boxing work and I wish more people thought like you and I.

                    Fvkk a protest......just get in the ring and handle business.

                    That's how boxing has always worked.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Lineal Champ View Post
                      Info on sig please
                      I second the motion... info on the sig pls.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP