Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

[The Tornado]

Bradley landed maybe 3 meaningful punches the whole fight, Pac landed 8-10 big punches 9 different rounds.

Robbery, people acting like it was close are being driven off of blind hate and ignorance

[-PBP-]

He made some good points. But "dominated" isn't the word to use when describing the second half of the fight. Maybe the last quarter of the fight (10,11 and 12 which appears to be the consensus for "Bradley Rounds") but not the second half of the fight.

I mean, if you assume the score was 1-1 after 2 rounds. And Bradley takes 10, 11 and 12. That's 4 for Bradley.

But I mean rounds 3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9; I just need more of an explanation of how Bradley took 2 of those rounds.

[edgarg]

Duane Ford quote: "Bradley gave Pacquiao a boxing lesson."

enough said but i will add that Ford must be suffering from advanced alzheimer's. He obviously remembering a different fight.

It's actually laughable that he regards a single point difference as a "boxing lesson', The poor guy is in a different word to normal people who see what they see. This remark alone should cause him to be suspended apart from the greater misjudgement he actually made.

[ChampBox@PR]

Yes, Bradley won those rounds clearly in my opinion. I've already re-watched the fight several times.

Platano you are usually a very good poster, but this is horse ****, Bradley won 2 rounds if that!!!

Im sorry but no analogy, or twisting of facts will change what I saw, Bradley got hurt, everytime pac landed solid, and Pac dominated in every category posible!!

[edgarg]

Dam pungent point Hugh. From the look on his face Bradley thought he was in a wet dream when he heard the decision.

Do you mean "cogent" point, perhaps? If "pungent", then you're saying that the point "stinks"......

[F l i c k e r]

Yea that was, thanks.
I remember this part.... everyone in the room was going crazy saying Pac was effing him up... wtf, he didn't even hit Bradley after that straight left

that's the effect of biased commentating.

[Wiley Hyena]

Do you mean "cogent" point, perhaps? If "pungent", then you're saying that the point "stinks"......

Actually the term "pungent" can be used as a literary device that means describing reality with descriptive force. "Cogent" would have been a good term to use as well, however.

[-PBP-]

I'm using Cotto's method. As a fan.

Wins and losses are losing their value. As a fan, for myself, there are decisions I completely discount when I'm having discussion/debate on a fighter's rating or legacy, or trying to predetermine the winner of an upcoming fight. If I was to use Boxrec, Compubox - and worst of all boxing judges, to gauge my fighters and potential outcomes, I'd be setting myself for all sorts of failure.

I'm no more disgusted with Bob Arum than I have been for years. He just got caught out in the open this time. He's been pulling this crap for ages.

And that's true..

Most robberies throughout boxing's history have little impact on a fighter's legacy. You just have to use your own eyes, pick your winner and be content with that.

[No-mas-tias]

Non story, he didn't even watch the fight. Reporter just wanted to fill up the newspaper with a Cotto headline.

[ThePunchingBag]

Cotto just says that these type of decisions happen in boxing and that the best thing a fighter can do when they happen is just to be happy with the way you performed and leave the rest to the public who knows the truth of what happened.