Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

[FeFist]

Ive lost allllll respect for Bradley! Like DLH said....Bradley knows he lost and should have handed over the belt to Manny! Man up you fu(kin coward!

Bradelys Corner said in the corner to Bradley..." Do you want to continue?" Why would they ask that if they thought he was winning???????

Bradley Told Max Kellerman when he was asked if he thought he won the fight...Bradley answered...." I have to go back and look at the tape!!!! WTF? Who says that? A person who knows he lost. Man up

[IronDanHamza]

I'm confused,did you see the fight closer the 2end time around??I had the fight close anyway..3 rds is not a large margin bro,and that's 3 rds having to listen to bias commentators,and being bothered by guest in my house...But watching it back I got a different view..Funny enough this is not the first time I seen a fight different the next day..Khan Peterson comes to mind,I had Peterson winning the night of,the next day I had a draw..An supposedly I hate Khan..I seen the fight better the next day,and was more focus the following day...

I had it closer yes but I can't see an argument for Bradley winning.

I agree there were close rounds but it's hard to give them to Bradley.

I can't see a argument for him winning.

[Rome-By-Ko]

In fairness to Rome, he didn't have the fight by blowout in the first viewing.

He had it to Pac by 3 rounds.

Thanks for being fair Dan,and in all fairness as well,I did also say if someone scored it for Manny I could not be mad..It was a close fight imo...

[LoadedWraps]

I'm thoroughly enjoying the pac stan frenzy. It's amazing how they went from swearing by Arum to cursing his name.

Agreed. ^^^^^

[LoadedWraps]

Thanks for being fair Dan,and in all fairness as well,I did also say if someone scored it for Manny I could not be mad..It was a close fight imo...

Good post. Very close fight that people refuse to acknowledge.

[Bermuda]

I had it closer yes but I can't see an argument for Bradley winning.

I agree there were close rounds but it's hard to give them to Bradley.

I can't see a argument for him winning.

neither can i.......

[brick wall]

some people here are delusional. they would readily tell you how biased those hbo commentators are but then would turn around and say their scores were affected by the (biased???) commentating

[Rome-By-Ko]

I had it closer yes but I can't see an argument for Bradley winning.

I agree there were close rounds but it's hard to give them to Bradley.

I can't see a argument for him winning.

I don't agree with you,but I can resect your view bro..

[Brother Jay]

It probably hurts to know that deep down inside, you know that 15 years down the line, know one will remember the things that you just said and most will see Pac top 15.

Hurts, doesn't it?

Pac won't be top 50. Historians are not pactards.

When they weigh what Pacquiao has done, the only value that will get him through the door will be his fights against Barrera and Morales.

JMM II - indecisive

DLH - coming off loss & weight drained

Hatton - coming off 1st loss & damaged after KO to Floyd

Cotto - coming off destruction by Margarito & drained

Clottey - coming off loss to Cotto and never been world class

Margarito - coming off KO loss and still banned at time of fight & drained

Mosley - coming off loss & looked terrible in next 2 fights

JMM - clear win for JMM despite Pacquiao having him come up to a weight he claims he could not make till this day.

Take those fights away(and a historian could not factor in those matches as legacy wins because of the conditions) and Pacquiao has to rely on the rest of his resume.

He may not break top 100.

Manny was already demoted before he fought Bradley. Manny isn't #2 any longer.

He was never #1 because he never beat anyone to become #1. Manny was never the #1 WW. Manny was never the #1 jrMW. As of November Manny wasn't the #1 anything.

We all knew this was coming. All of the talk about "has Manny aged?" was just softening the blow. The excuses were already made. The scenario was already painted out.

Before Manny and Tim stepped in the ring, the whispers had already begun .. the seeds had already been planted .. the doubts were already apparent.

This performance by Manny was not worse than his performance against JMM or Clottey. Its just that his fans are not impartial and only see Manny doing well.

Those days are over. They hype is on a billboard for everyone to see.

Regardless of how this may have been orchestrated so that a rematch resulted, this match was important as it demonstrated what some of us have been saying for years: Manny only has his jab, jab straight left hand and once he's fighting someone who can actually box AND MOVE, he's a dud.

Pacfans are right. There is no argument anymore.

[Russian Crushin]

I'm confused,did you see the fight closer the 2end time around??I had the fight close anyway..3 rds is not a large margin bro,and that's 3 rds having to listen to bias commentators,and being bothered by guest in my house...But watching it back I got a different view..Funny enough this is not the first time I seen a fight different the next day..Khan Peterson comes to mind,I had Peterson winning the night of,the next day I had a draw..An supposedly I hate Khan..I seen the fight better the next day,and was more focus the following day...

You would need at least a 4 round swing to go from PAC winnig by 3 to Bradley winning by one.

I'm sorry but if you ever have a 4 round swing, please stop scoring fights