Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

[J Dubb II 330]

Manny was Brawling when Juan Manuel was boxing.

Brawlers can beat boxers without outboxing them, that's why they are great match ups.

[J Dubb II 330]

For instance Cotto can outbox Manny, but succumbs to pressure and high work rate (see Marg fight)

[Furn]

Manny was Brawling when Juan Manuel was boxing.

Brawlers can beat boxers without outboxing them, that's why they are great match ups.

Brawling is taking one to give one, Manny doesn't do that he hits his opponents a lot more than they hit him.(Marquez aside)

Theres many ways to outbox someone it's not the exclusive domain of defensive minded cautious counterpunchers. You can outbox someone 1000 punches to 500 or 10 to 5.

[SplitSecond]

pacquiao already is p4p#1, has been for awhile now

only idiots think floyd deserves to be over him with his fight once a year crap against a cheated marquez and the likes of ortiz and squeeking out a win against a cotto who pacquiao already destroyed

[The Big Dunn]

pacquiao already is p4p#1, has been for awhile now

only idiots think floyd deserves to be over him with his fight once a year crap against a cheated marquez and the likes of ortiz and squeeking out a win against a cotto who pacquiao already destroyed

But manny only got the spot when floyd retired for a while. Since he's been back and beat JMM, shouldn't he get his spot back?

[IMDAZED]

Brawling is taking one to give one, Manny doesn't do that he hits his opponents a lot more than they hit him.(Marquez aside)

Theres many ways to outbox someone it's not the exclusive domain of defensive minded cautious counterpunchers. You can outbox someone 1000 punches to 500 or 10 to 5.

Does this even make sense to you? What if you take one to give two? That's also brawling. And that is what Manny is doing--according to your second sentence.

[Furn]

No, that's not true and in fact it's contradictory. And second, Richard Schafer said himself he believed a Khan fight wouldn't happen because Bradley was chasing after a Pacquiao fight which, in case you haven't noticed, he got. Get over yourself--you really do sound like that dumb **** Dirk. If Bradley was risk averse, he wouldn't fight Pacquiao at all; he'd turn the fight down and keep taking easy paydays. He's not. So the idea that he'd jump at the opportunity to fight Pacquiao and yet "duck" Khan makes no sense.

What easy paydays ? Whos paying big $ to this guy to fight nobody's ?

Hes fighting Pac because he's getting $5 mil to do it and getting huge exposure. Are you telling me an impressive win over khan in Nov wouldn't have got Bradley a Bigger payday in this fight. It wouldn't have brought a lot more hype to it?

People are carrying on like Bradley is coming into this fight in career best form having cleaned out 140. The truth is Bradley has one pretty ordinary win over a 40 year old in almost a year and a half.

[FromAfrica]

[Furn]

Does this even make sense to you? What if you take one to give two? That's also brawling. And that is what Manny is doing--according to your second sentence.

So anyone who gets hit at all is a brawler?

Manny doesn't just take punches, he gets hit more than some other guys because he throws more. He's a aggressive fighter.

Can you not box aggressively?

[FromAfrica]

3:10