Defamation....Might Back fire on Manny Pacquiao

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hugh grant
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2006
    • 30535
    • 2,200
    • 922
    • 105,596

    #31
    Just give him $5million floyd already, and then try to make 10 million back from him in the ring. A nice profit of 5 million.

    Comment

    • PAKYO
      in the sandlands
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 3805
      • 116
      • 73
      • 10,212

      #32
      TS is ****** as ****** gets.

      Hope you donate some leftover food to floyd later on once he's become a hobo.

      Comment

      • Horus
        Greatest Of My Era
        • Dec 2007
        • 10220
        • 772
        • 112
        • 18,146

        #33
        Originally posted by PrinceCharlez
        Defamation- A publication of a defamatory, false statement of fact.

        To be convicted of Defamation one needs four elements of proof.

        1)Publication: statement to a third party (a person other than the subject of the statement). Example: Saying something in front of a class room of people.

        2)Defamatory: Injury to the reputation of the subject.
        3) false statement of fact: Not an opinion or prediction. (Floyd Sr gave an opinion on how a fighter cant come from a lower weight to dominate bigger fighters, after struggling with smaller fighters. That is an opinion not a statement of facts)

        4)THrough the fault of the defendant: Of plantiff is a public figure must be intentional falsehood or actual malice, reckless.

        intentional- know the statment is false (Mayweathers didnt know statement was false and still dont because Manny has never subjected himself to random testing.)Reckless- No basis to believe the statement is true.

        Defenses:1)Conditional Priviledge: Statements made as a matter of the defendants business interest are not actionable....Boxing is a business and floyd was negotiating a fight, where he asked "If both parties would subject themselves to random testing" to carry on further business of the fight.

        2) Truth: Statements by defendant must be false to be actionable. (Manny never submitted to testing to prove that he was clean.)3) Retraction: A defense to lessen damages only. (THere was never a retraction from floyd camp to show that they were lying on manny. THere wasnt a retraction because they never said anything factual just opinions.)
        Welcome to Boxingscene. I definitely proud to see work like this.

        Comment

        • Horus
          Greatest Of My Era
          • Dec 2007
          • 10220
          • 772
          • 112
          • 18,146

          #34
          Originally posted by 120
          Horus would be proud...
          You know me well

          Comment

          • tomhawq
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2008
            • 4194
            • 586
            • 183
            • 8,620

            #35
            Originally posted by Horus
            Welcome to Boxingscene. I definitely proud to see work like this.
            yes. i hope the whining and complaining about this lawsuit would cease to exist now. whether it backfires or not why would you not want this to go on if you're a floyd fanboy. this court battle is all about peds, peds, peds, which floyd fanboys can't get enough of. this lawsuit should be welcomed with open arms by floyd supporters, don't you think?

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP