i been looking more up about this "no contest"
regarding to vitali vs. solis
i thought a "no contest" can only be claimed if the injury is caused by a illegal punch/headbutt etc..
since it was a LEGAL punch, that caused the injury, and since solis could not continue its a legitimate win
so why are some people claiming for a "no contest"??
regarding to vitali vs. solis
i thought a "no contest" can only be claimed if the injury is caused by a illegal punch/headbutt etc..
since it was a LEGAL punch, that caused the injury, and since solis could not continue its a legitimate win
so why are some people claiming for a "no contest"??
Comment