It's just two totally different styles. You really can't say Sergio is more skillful than Pac based on his kind of fighting style. The thing is that Pac has the credibility of fighting more top class fighters than Sergio and has beaten them with his style (skills). Sergio isn't any less of a skillful fighter, he just hasn't warranted any belief that he has better skills Pac just yet.
Pacquiao and Sergio: Who is more skilled?
Collapse
-
-
Sergio, and it isn't even close.
Actually read the damn question. Who is the more "skilled"
Not who fought the better opposition. Good god. By some of the logic on this forum, I guess "margarito" is one of the most "skilled" fighters ever.
Stylistically sergio outskill spacman and it isn't even close. Other GREATS who weren't that SKILLED include George Foreman, Joe Frazier, Henry Armstrong, etc.
Sergio shows his ability to counter, movement, ability to slip punches, fight in the inside, outside, and whilst moving.
Pacmans defense is NOT better than sergios (or more skillful). pacman unrelenting offense is his defense the majority of the time.. or just putting his gloves up.
His foot work is decent, moving in and out, but it isn't " ring generalship" like sergio uses his foot work.
Punch selection seems about even, although Sergio is more a precision punches off the start where as pacman is a combination puncher. The skill his is subjective. IMO the timing sergio uses requires more reflex thus more skilled.
The list goes on.. actually look at how they fight. Sergio is a more skillfull fighter than pacman. As is donaire.
I think Pavlik is overrated.Comment
-
my questions:
Is combination punching not a skill?
is a fighter's style the same as skill? coz pac's style sometimes doesn't look good on the eyes.
I still think pac's more skillful by using his technique and adjusting and making it effective.Comment
-
They are about even.Martinez is more versatile but Pacman's offensive skills are 2nd to none.I saw someone post about if they were the same size Pacman smashes him,I don't know bout that Martinez gives angles,slips punches counters well & throws a good jab & a commanding left hand.In short,Martinez would be the best boxer & strongest since Marquez,tough tough night either way.But right now at 154 Martinez destroys him because of his size & skill combined.Comment
-
Sergio, and it isn't even close.
Actually read the damn question. Who is the more "skilled"
Not who fought the better opposition. Good god. By some of the logic on this forum, I guess "margarito" is one of the most "skilled" fighters ever.
Stylistically sergio outskill spacman and it isn't even close. Other GREATS who weren't that SKILLED include George Foreman, Joe Frazier, Henry Armstrong, etc.
Sergio shows his ability to counter, movement, ability to slip punches, fight in the inside, outside, and whilst moving.
Pacmans defense is NOT better than sergios (or more skillful). pacman unrelenting offense is his defense the majority of the time.. or just putting his gloves up.
His foot work is decent, moving in and out, but it isn't " ring generalship" like sergio uses his foot work.
Punch selection seems about even, although Sergio is more a precision punches off the start where as pacman is a combination puncher. The "skill" in their punching is subjective. I think sergios counter mind set shows sharp reflexes and timing which is more of a skill than pacquires combinations punching. Pacman is the result of hard work, big balls, and great conditioning.
The list goes on.. actually look at how they fight. Sergio is a more skillfull fighter than pacman. As is donaire.
When pacman drops his hands and slips punches, then talk to me.Comment
-
If they were the same size, Pac would most likely win.
Martinez has never faced a fighter of Pac's calibur...
they might go the distance but I don't think he'll last like CottoComment
-
lol. This shouldn't even be close the only advantage of martinez to pac is the size and strenght nothing.Comment
Comment