no, more lies again. he was not in the welterweight rankings or p4p rankings because he was inactive for more than a year
lol at tune up excuse, he fought marquez because he didnt want to fight a top welter
a prime pac, mosley, cotto, margo and kosta at 140 would have beaten the living hell out of him
as long as he has nut huggers like you making excuses for his pathetic fights, he will keep doing it
you dont know **** about boxing, you are a disgrace of a fan excusing the bull**** he has done
oh and yes, the pac vs mosley fight is also a big pile of bull****
i aint a fan of either, i call them out on what they have done, i aint a nut hugger like you. oh and clottey was a damn good win, for me his best win against a ww because he beat cotto in my eyes. clottey is a good fighter, the very definition of a high risk low reward fighter, very underrated.
if floyd fought marquez at 130, he would have gone life and death with him as well, in fact he would have gotten his ass whooped. a prime marquez against a prime mayweather at 130 takes floyd out. a prime morales, cotto an margarito also take out floyd at their respective weight classes
Okay, three points:
1)
2) "if floyd fought marquez at 130..he would have gotten his ass whooped." I honestly can't tell if you are being serious here. Do you understand Floyd is probably the best super featherweight of all time? I know you don't think so, because you're an irrational critic of Mayweather.
3) You're post is full of ramblings about "oh so and so in his prime at their best weight would have killed floyd!" but you still haven't said who, other than Pacquiao of course, was a better option for Floyd to fight in May 2010. I'm really curious to hear who you think was.
2) "if floyd fought marquez at 130..he would have gotten his ass whooped." I honestly can't tell if you are being serious here. Do you understand Floyd is probably the best super featherweight of all time? I know you don't think so, because you're an irrational critic of Mayweather.
3) You're post is full of ramblings about "oh so and so in his prime at their best weight would have killed floyd!" but you still haven't said who, other than Pacquiao of course, was a better option for Floyd to fight in May 2010. I'm really curious to hear who you think was.
Jesus what is it with *******s and their revisionist history? Hatton won a welterweight title and was undefeated when Floyd KO'd him.
Mayweather fought DLH at 154 for a legit title (not a vacant catchweight belt). Your boy Pacquiao fought a f****** 147 emaciated version of De La Hoya who had to be medically rehydrated. (little known fact, Pacquiao actually outweighed Oscar on FIGHT NIGHT).
And the Mosley/pacquiao fight is considered garbage because Floyd already had his way with him. Mosley came begging to roach on multiple occasions for a pacman fight, and he was willing to go as low as something ridiculous like 142 or 140 and he still had Team Pacman all shook. Only after Mosley looked bad in his last two fights was Manny willing to fight him.
Hatton was the lineal 140 champion when Pacquiao waxed him in 2 rounds. His best weight was 140, this is not a point for debate.
Pac was 1 fight removed from fighting at featherweight when he took on DLH who had been fighting at a 150 catchweight. So in the span of about 8 months, Manny had to climb up 3 weight classes while Oscar had to shed 3 lbs. DLH was the 2-1 favorite and EVERYONE outside of a few people picked Oscar to win by an easy KO. How'd that turn out? Floyd had to jump from 147-154, one weight class and all he could muster was a boring split decision against a shot Oscar.
Fighting and beating Cotto (who beat Mosley) made more sense both logistically and financially. Roach doesn't pick Manny's fights, Arum does.
By May 8th, Pacquiao will have beaten ALL of them in dominant fashion. So all your arguing is just like trying to p*ss in the wind. Pacquiao is the #1 P4P fighter on the planet and an ATG, nothing you say or try to do will change that FACT, but thanks for playing anyway
I'm a Floyd fan and I have no issues with these rankings. I think at this point u could even put Donaire at #3. If Floyd doesn't fight this summer he should no longer be ranked.
Hatton was the lineal 140 champion when Pacquiao waxed him in 2 rounds. His best weight was 140, this is not a point for debate.
Pac was 1 fight removed from fighting at featherweight when he took on DLH who had been fighting at a 150 catchweight. So in the span of about 8 months, Manny had to climb up 3 weight classes while Oscar had to shed 3 lbs. DLH was the 2-1 favorite and EVERYONE outside of a few people picked Oscar to win by an easy KO. How'd that turn out? Floyd had to jump from 147-154, one weight class and all he could muster was a boring split decision against a shot Oscar.
Fighting and beating Cotto (who beat Mosley) made more sense both logistically and financially. Roach doesn't pick Manny's fights, Arum does.
By May 8th, Pacquiao will have beaten ALL of them in dominant fashion. So all your arguing is just like trying to p*ss in the wind. Pacquiao is the #1 P4P fighter on the planet and an ATG, nothing you say or try to do will change that FACT, but thanks for playing anyway
Pac is the current #1 P4P fighter and an all time great, but if you are going to sit here and try to convice yourself that Pac's wins over Hatton and DLH were more legit than Floyd's then you are ignorant plain and simple. That would be like saying that Floyd's utterly dominant win over Marquez was more impressive than Pac's wins over Marquez, simply not true because of when they fought and the circumstances.
Comment