Why hasn't Yuri Foreman been criticized for quitting on his stool?

[Steak]

Remember all the flax Victor Ortiz received after he quit because of a bad cut in his fight with Maidana?

And people were critical of Devon Alexander for quitting against Bradley.

Both those fighters were visibly marked and had serious cuts.

Yuri Foreman was being hit, but he wasn't cut or injured...

Why hasn't he been criticized for quitting on his stool?

I dont know Tuney.

what do you think?

[ThePunchingBag]

Because he's a ***.

[Russian Crushin]

Its because there is ZERO hype and very low expectations for Yuri. Nobody made him out to be a world beater.

Read Tunney read

[DrewWoodside]

Probably because nobody really gives a crap about Yuri Foreman, sadly. People who receive hate are usually more "important" or relevant fighters.

First, expectations for Foreman were low. Second, everyone's trying to figure out how to react to Martinez stopping Dzinziruk.

[The Hammer]

Its because there is ZERO hype and very low expectations for Yuri. Nobody made him out to be a world beater.

ZERO hype??

But he was interviewed on Good Morning America!

Victor Ortiz and Devon Alexander are not known except to hardcore boxing fans.

[heat27]

cause the haters are too busy hating on cotto

[Joeyzagz]

I really like Yuri Foreman, and its sh.tty to pile on this guy after a loss like that.

I'll be sure to show Vitali more respect if he is unfortunate against Solis.

[The Hammer]

There are many people who still **** on Vitali Klitchko for not continuing because of the rotator cusp injury in the fight with Byrd, even though it was 11 years ago.

[P4P Opinion]

I can't make my mind up as to whether Tunney intended this thread to be anti-semitic or whether he intended it to be a bait thread, based on the expectation that he is anti-semitic so he can proclaim that criticising ***ish people is instantly labelled anti-semitism. Either way, you can guarantee that he had slimy manipulative intentions as usual. Note how Tunney hasn't come out and addressed the obvious implication of his questions - quite the social propagandist.

[The Hammer]

I can't make my mind up as to whether Tunney intended this thread to be anti-semitic or whether he intended it to be a bait thread, based on the expectation that he is anti-semitic so he can proclaim that criticising ***ish people is instantly labelled anti-semitism. Either way, you can guarantee that he had slimy manipulative intentions as usual. Note how Tunney hasn't come out and addressed the obvious implication of his questions - quite the social propagandist.

That's one of the most vicious, hateful, unfair comments I've ever seen.